Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: Glass vs Aluminum

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
sworrall
Posted 11/18/2004 11:37 AM (#125481 - in reply to #125447)
Subject: RE: Glass vs Aluminum





Posts: 32954


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
LC has it right. Fiberglass is actually structurally more sound than aluminum because it requires no welds or rivets, so has no weak points. Weight is about the same between Fiberglass and Aluminum too. As far as surface damage goes, if you hit a Fiberglass hull hard enough to do damage, you most certainly will damage an aluminim as badly. The key is the ability to reasonably easily and inexpensively repair fiberglass to it's original shape and finish, which is not easily accomplished with aluminum.

The ride is usually better because fiberglass is molded prefectly to shape for good hydrodynamics, and aluminum, even when stretch formed, is more difficult to work with. All in all, both are good boat building materials.

For some reason, the idea that a fiberglass boat can't take rocky areas or impacts still persists. In fact, a keel guard on the boat will allow a glass boat to be dragged right up on the rocks with no problem, simply eliminating scratching and gouging that occurs in both materials when dragged onto rocks.

Fiberglass boats are built inside out, so to speak. The finish is applied to the mold first, then the woven roving and high tech composites are applied. Aluminums are built, primed, and painted much like an automobile.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)