Post a message

Muskie Discussion Forums

Search | Statistics | User Listing

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Posting a reply to: Re: Side imaging- Size vs quality/price

Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors

Guest name

Subject

Message

Emoticons

HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes

Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons

You are replying to:

Kirby Budrow

Posted 3/3/2021 8:47 AM (#976337 - in reply to #976314)
Subject: Re: Side imaging- Size vs quality/price

Posts: 2337

Location: Chisholm, MN

MKevin - 3/2/2021 3:53 PM

pstrombe - 2/28/2021 11:53 AM

After 35+ years with Lowrance I switched to Hummingbird and will never go back. Biggest screen you can comfortably afford is a good rule. Currently have a Helix 10 & 8 in rear and 8 upfront. The rear 8 is down scan only and is used primarily for navigation. If the lake is really a rock pile I will use the bigger screen when running between spots. The Helix 8 is also used for ice fishing. Good Luck

Im really having a problem setting a floor on the minimum screen size I want to get... I thought that was 7 but the more I read about it, the more I think Im going to want to upgrade it 2 months in...

That's correct. Get an 8 or 9