Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Ethanol, non ethonol, treated, untreated comparisons

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
undersized
Posted 10/31/2019 11:24 AM (#949225 - in reply to #949219)
Subject: Re: Ethanol, non ethonol, treated, untreated comparisons




Posts: 93


Ha ha. Humor. Is that better?

It's not worse...unlike:

VMS - 10/31/2019 10:18 AM
Response: Then ignore the conversation and go find something else that interests you.

"Go directly to jokey joke jail. Do not pass Go. Do not collect 20 dollars."

More seriously, no one really needs convincing on this which is why coming off the top rope seems like such an over-reaction and generates some snark in response. The small number of people who are pure gas die-hards isn't significant, and those running it in small engines like mowers and outboards don't add up to much at all on a fuel markets level. I just don't understand getting so incensed about a small impact choice by a limited number of people. Biofuel demand is at an all time high in the U.S. (over 10% total blend) in spite of the impact of small refinery exemptions and the first ethanol production drop in 20 years. So while that might have corn farmers and ethanol plant workers upset (I listen to farm country radio news), the gas market is clearly integrating it just fine because the engine technology handles it just fine.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)