Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Recon vs Tuffy

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Paul S
Posted 8/9/2017 11:39 AM (#873673 - in reply to #873649)
Subject: Re: Recon vs Tuffy




Posts: 229


Location: Tinley Park, IL
Glaucus_ - 8/9/2017 10:30 AM

In my judgment, more realistic purchase reasons than "toughness" are how well the layout matches your fishing style, the details of fit and finish, and cost/value.


I agree. I only bought a Tuffy since the X-190 had the best combination of a bass boat deck with the ability to handle rougher water that I could easily put a kicker on. So fitting my needs was the main reason I bought a Tuffy. It wasn't until I owned the boat and operated it that I began to subscribe to the idea of "tough as hell" hull. I didn't really think much about the Kevlar in the hull but I have changed my tune on that after some firsthand experiences.

In terms of evidence and data, I just don't think you're going to find that. I have read so much about boats and motors over the last few years and you just don't see many, if any, comprehensive, comparison reviews on boats. There are no Consumer Reports that you can look at for customer satisfaction and reliability data. I would love if they had the resources for boats and motors that they do for automobiles. We mostly rely on personal experiences and hearsay to form our opinions.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)