Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Lowrance vs Hummingbird

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Jerry Newman
Posted 3/25/2017 1:17 PM (#854879 - in reply to #854454)
Subject: Re: Lowrance vs Hummingbird




Location: 31
Fishysam - 3/23/2017 6:50 PM

The 16" carbon has one bad assf feature I want in birds soon!!! It can have two transducers on the screen at one time. Example rear 2d and bow 2d ideal for seeing if automatic anchors like tallon or power pole will reach bottom also while drifting weed edges/ steep breaklines gives you a 20' buffer to stay on the edge!


You can network the front and back transducer for several years now with the Gen2s. I have a very limited experience with Humminbird, but guessing equally up to the task.

Out of curiosity do they have a trade-in policy like Lowrance?

“You can now view and control traditional sonar and structure sonar
independent of one another on an Ethernet network. That allows
you to view traditional sonar from a trolling motor transducer, while
viewing StructureScan data from a transducer mounted on the
transom.”


Edited by Jerry Newman 3/25/2017 3:20 PM

(Delete all cookies set by this site)