Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Honda vs Suzuki

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Captain
Posted 8/19/2016 8:49 AM (#827841 - in reply to #827395)
Subject: Re: Honda vs Suzuki




Posts: 437


I have a Suzuki 150 on my boat which is the same block as the 175. This is an incredible motor. I have run out of superlatives to say how great it is or how much I love it.
Contrary to what some have said, my boat is rated for a 200, but I have a 150 on it. Loaded with a full tank of gas (41 gallons) 3 guys, tons of gear (camping for a week on LOW), easily 500# and I was seeing 45MPH on GPS. We have a 22 mile boat ride in to the island where we camp and obviously a 22 mile boat ride back when we leave. I wish I had turned on the odometer on my GPS to actually track how many miles covered, but I make the entire week without refueling while my buddy with his Yamaha has to add 10 gallons (he does have a slightly smaller tank though too).
I wont say anything bad about Honda because they make great things. My buddy has a 90 and its been bulletproof for him.
I could say without hesitation I would recommend the 175. Another buddy of mine just bought a new pontoon with a 175 Suzuki on it. I asked him how he liked it and he just couldn't believe the difference, in how quiet it is and speed. He had a Honda on his previous pontoon, but always complained about speed (kinda funny complaining about speed on a pontoon). I don't recall what size Honda it was though, but I am sure it was more of a matter of underpowered for the size pontoon and not necessarily a fault of the motor itself.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)