Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: Glass Hull Histories? Similarities?

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
NickD
Posted 6/19/2015 7:48 AM (#773209 - in reply to #772967)
Subject: RE: Glass Hull Histories? Similarities?




Posts: 296


What's the difference between the 1890 Hi-Perf. V and the 1760 deep-V?


I went from a 1760 to an 1890 this spring. Had fished in an 1890 but never really looked at the hull until I got my new to me boat. From a detail perspective the 2 are completely different. The 1890 has a stepped transom, the sides aren't as vertical, and at rest there is a whole lot more hull in the water but on plane I bet it has less. Hard to describe without just looking at each hull. A 1760gt could fit inside the 1890gt. They both seem to sit the same distance above the water when you are standing on the deck. The 1890 is a good bit more stable at rest. With the exact same HPs I bet the 1890 would be able to keep up with the smaller 1760. I'm guessing that has to do with the pad in the back. Both in the tiller version lean to port bad at mid range when the passenger is a good bit heavier than the driver. Both go dead flat at full throttle. I bet the console guys hardly notice since they cruise at what my tillers maxed out at.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)