Post a message

Muskie Discussion Forums

Search | Statistics | User Listing

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Posting a reply to: Re: bigger esox magnum... or similar.

Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors

Guest name

Subject

Message

Emoticons

HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes

Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons

You are replying to:

Macintosh

Posted 4/13/2013 5:19 PM (#634384 - in reply to #630863)
Subject: Re: bigger esox magnum... or similar.

Posts: 117

It's also fairly low to the water, and it's not as heavy as most boats of that size--it's actually a pretty unique boat that frankly I'm surprised there aren't more of. I'm wondering what it is about that boat that would cause someone to not want it and pine for a similar sized boat with similar attributes--Im trying to understand what is wrong with an x190 that people would really want the sponsoned hull. No one Ive ever heard has ever complained that a 90" wide glass hull similar to an x190 or even a real deep v isn't stable enough, heck I see guys standing on the gunwales of their boats fishing all the time and hardly heeling it over, so what does the sponsoned hull do better than x190? What won't it do as well as an x190? Or is it a interior layout issue? Getting a little lost in the terminology and different models, and missing the reasons behind everything here.