Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Lund Predator 1810 vs 1675 Impact SS

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Mike Phillips
Posted 1/31/2012 12:31 PM (#535824 - in reply to #535781)
Subject: Re: Lund Predator 1810 vs 1675 Impact SS


Thats a better comparison there. The 1775 Impart SS w/ a 125 Optimax should be only $800 more than a 1810 Predator with the same motor. The Impact is only 4 inches shorter than the Predator but is 9 inches wider.It also weighs 325lbs more than the Predator and has a top speed of 42-46MPH with the 125 Opti. Both boats have same size side rod boxes, but the Impact has the nice extra rod locker under the front deck. The cockpit is a little deeper and much roomier than the predators but the front deck is a little smaller.The Impact is still a more flexible boat as far as trolling goes,but the Predator is still a better setup if you are strictly a caster.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)