Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Anybody doing the side imaging sonar from either Hummingbird or Lowrance?

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
ESOX Maniac
Posted 8/28/2010 5:36 PM (#457146 - in reply to #457137)
Subject: Re: Anybody doing the side imaging sonar from either Hummingbird or Lowrance?





Posts: 2754


Location: Mauston, Wisconsin
Steve, No reason to pee on a post, I actually like what I see- re. the Lowrance Downscan. The facts of who's better are imbedded in the DSP capabilities and features customers want, like was posted in some other discussions, re. HB vs Lowrance, it can only get better- competition is good. They are both reputable companies and certainly they are not involved in miss-information dissemination.

Yes-
I'd think you have a ghost may be a good analysis. However, even ghost's have a reason for existance, its just hard to understand why. I'd send it back to HB for repair/checkout. There are all kinds of strange stuff that can happen w/ either analog or digital systems. The fact you can replace the unit indicates to me its a unit problem, and I'm sure if it's internal they will fix it. The fact it loses and re-aquires the transducer would lead me to look at the transducer connections and transducer analog circuits. Maybe it's a bad A/D converter? All the folks at HB should need is an accurate description of the problem as you see it! Don't try to troubleshoot, just tell them what you see as a user.


Good luck,
Al

(Delete all cookies set by this site)