Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: Crestliner Vs Alumacraft

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
hunterjoe
Posted 3/18/2010 4:32 PM (#429718 - in reply to #429696)
Subject: RE: Crestliner Vs Alumacraft


Grass - 3/18/2010 3:27 PM

I ended up buying a Fishhawk because there are a lot more used Fishhawks on the market than Navigators.


Not trying to sway you in either direction, but here's something to think about. You see a lot of used Crestliners for sale and not many Alumacrafts. This wouldn't be a big deal, but I see a lot of Alumacrafts on the water where I fish. Makes me think the people who buy them don't want to get rid of them. I'm not trying to sway you in your decision one way or the other. I'm pretty much deciding between the same boats while I'm leaning a bit more towards the Alumacraft. For one, I can put more hp on the 17' Aumacraft vs the Crestliner. To compare the similar boats, the Navigator will take up to 150 while the similar 1750 fishhawk only takes 125. Not that you need the 150, as both boats would perform great with a 115, but I do want a boat with a 150 for myself.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)