Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: Crestliner Vs Alumacraft

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
PMV
Posted 3/17/2010 9:37 PM (#429562 - in reply to #429522)
Subject: RE: Crestliner Vs Alumacraft




Posts: 28


I have the crestliner cmv, which is a little shallower than the fishhawk and is pretty much all deck front to back, except for a 2'-3' section in the middle for the console and riding seats. The decks are probably about 6 inches down from the top rail and I do find myself watching my daughter closely if she is on the decks, but I am watching her pretty close in a boat anyway. I think for family use, a deeper boat would be better, but for the inland puddles I fish, I prefer being up higher in the boat and closer to the water, than in a higher sided, deeper boat. One note, I don't think they make this model anymore.

I have noticed a small amount of the flexing on the front deck. It is minimal, I'm about 180lbs. I had only one experience with customer service. The plastic trim piece around the gas cap cracked, and they sent one out right away.

I agree with what most have said regarding the motor; don't underpower, you'll regret it. I have a 150 4 stroke, its a 18' boat, and max hp.

I haven't fished in a alumacraft, so I can't comment on any differences. Pay attention to some of the little stuff, like hinges, latch's, etc. for quality. This is the stuff that doesn't hold up over time and is annoying to fix. You should be able to compare hull thickness' from their brochures. I think crestliner makes a good product for their price range in that market.

PMV






(Delete all cookies set by this site)