Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: Crestliner Vs Alumacraft

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
curleytail
Posted 3/17/2010 12:59 PM (#429425 - in reply to #429400)
Subject: RE: Crestliner Vs Alumacraft




Posts: 2687


Location: Hayward, WI
I think both are great boats. Saying that - I prefer the Alumacraft. I have an older Navigator 165 Tiller. My Uncle has the newer 165 in the console version. I like the storage of the Navigators. They really don't have ANY wasted space. I think one of the "side tanks" on the crestliners is still pretty much nothing but flotation, where the Navigators have rod lockers on either side. I use one side for rods and the other for extra storage. Can actually fit a lot of stuff in there.

The maiden voyage of my Uncle's 165 was in VERY rough water, and we were both impressed how well it handled the big waves and how solid it felt, not to mention dry.

I'm sure the Crestliner is very nice, probably has plenty of storage, and handles good sized water well too. I wouln't make a decision before you compare each boat in person. I think Crestliner is nice but I do really like Alumacrafts.

curleytail

(Delete all cookies set by this site)