Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: Lowrance vs. Humminbird?

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
guest
Posted 3/9/2010 7:12 AM (#427794 - in reply to #427449)
Subject: RE: Lowrance vs. Humminbird?


I have spent a fair amount of time trying to decide between the Low and the Bird. If after countless hours I am right here are some of the following thoughts:
The Lowrance uses digital technology vs analog so it should be crisper.
The Lowrance waypoint/icon system is way better than the bird.
I think the sonar is clearer.
I think the downscanning is better.

On the bird they have had side imaging out longer
The lake master highlight feature is nice
I like the screen layout.

In terms of customer service I have called both low and bird tech lines and had great help from both. Not sure why everyone is dissing low?


Either decision would be good. I am going with Lowrance as to me it has more options that will help me catch fish. (waypoint/icon system) The side imaging may or may not put more fish in the boat, but for the troller locating structure to troll around may be like cheating.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)