Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: Univesal sonar vs. Regular Transducer

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


 Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Reef Hawg
Posted 3/10/2008 9:04 PM (#306617 - in reply to #306467)
Subject: RE: Univesal sonar vs. Regular Transducer




Posts: 3518


Location: north central wisconsin		I ran a Universal sonar 2 for all of 2007, and while it beats the hassle of tangled cords, is nowhere near as sensitive as my transducer in back. It does have temp though, which is cool, and it did work all year without fail. That said, I can see weeds quite well(though deep lying stuff is lost on the U.S.2) and follow structure as I intend to with the front unit, looking at the 'main' screen in back for higher detail of the situation.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)