Post a message

Muskie Discussion Forums

Search | Statistics | User Listing

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Posting a reply to: RE: tuffy question

Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors

Guest name

Subject

Message

Emoticons

[QUOTE]Shep - 2/1/2007  8:17 AM

Brad the 690 is a pretty good boat, maybe one of the best Ranger built. And while the two years warranty you have left may give you peace of mind, it is unlikely you will need it. That's all I'm saying. I ran out of warranty on my 97 F150 after two years, and never gave it a second thought. Why is it that a hull warranty is criticised for "Only" 5 years, yet a vehicle that costs thousands more, and driven daily year round, is OK when the warranty expires after less than 3 years? Why would you ever buy a new, or used, vehicle with less than a lifetime, or 10 year transferable warranty? Because you'd never find one, because no manufacturer would ever be stupid enough to offer one. The rate of incidence is so low on boat hulls, that a manufacturer can offer a long warranty, without a lot of risk. But what is the point?

As for the Tuffy dry storage? Yup, maybe in boats that were built more than 4 years ago. But with the redesign of the decks, Tuffy's now have dry storage. Oh, and I'd bet my new digital camera that Rangers are not always dry. Why do you think I had to get a new digital camera last summer?[/QUOTE]

HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes

Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons

You are replying to:

Shep

Posted 2/1/2007 8:17 AM (#235474 - in reply to #235466)
Subject: RE: tuffy question

Posts: 5874