Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: 175 Navigator thoughts ????

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
VMS
Posted 3/26/2006 7:31 PM (#184318 - in reply to #183014)
Subject: RE: 175 Navigator thoughts ????





Posts: 3508


Location: Elk River, Minnesota
Good set-up!! Either one you choose...165 or 175, you have picked good items. Definitely max the HP for either rig. One thing to consider....the 165 is 16'-7" and 36" deep in the bow with a 90" beam. The 175 is 17'-3", 37" deep and a 93" beam. Not much difference at all, except the 175 has the 2XB hull whereas the 165 has just the 2XB bow. There is just under 300 pounds difference in weight between the two.

My personal opinion is you only get 20 hp more with the 175 over the 165. The boats are almost identical, save the 2nd livewell in the 175. So...might save a bit of money by going with the 165, and you have a boat that is only 8" shorter and 3" narrower.

Steve

(Delete all cookies set by this site)