Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: RE: Just for the sake of discussion...the Ultimate Muskie Boat

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
sworrall
Posted 12/17/2005 7:10 PM (#169048 - in reply to #169040)
Subject: RE: Just for the sake of discussion...the Ultimate Muskie Boat





Posts: 32886


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
If you use a tiller handle extension, the rear deck would be just fine in the 1760. I believe that Merten's handle is longer for a couple of the brands of outboards. The rear of that boat has more walkable and fishable area WITHOUT a deck than most do WITH. Also, there is a 1/2 deck (again, this is also a storage box) option that can be mounted either side, allowing one to get close to the transom with the seating and still have an extended 'side tank' storage box either side. The 1890 will have even MORE fishable and walkable area. Think now, if a deck extension makes it tough to reach the handle, the area that is standard has to be pretty substantial. The rear deck in the Esox Deep V models is really quite large, remembering that one can walk all over the splashwell area unlike most other boats.


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(overhead_1760_c.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments overhead_1760_c.jpg (21KB - 172 downloads)

(Delete all cookies set by this site)