|
|
Posts: 1636
|  |
|
| |
|
Posts: 20179
Location: oswego, il | I voted in the my spoon is bigger than your spoon poll. Brandon, hope all is well in AZ. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 4343
Location: Smith Creek | Election season is here. The polls are inescapable. |
|
| |
|
Location: Sawyer County, WI | Now there is some "good data" ! |
|
| |
|
Location: varies | this poll is too vague. there is not enough data in the choices to vote one way or another. For instance ... What is considered a big or little fish in this poll? therefore, the margin for error is too great and I cannot vote. If I did, I fear it would skew the data. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 16632
Location: The desert | rodbender - 1/28/2016 7:00 AM
this poll is too vague. there is not enough data in the choices to vote one way or another. For instance ... What is considered a big or little fish in this poll? therefore, the margin for error is too great and I cannot vote. If I did, I fear it would skew the data.
Ha! |
|
| |
|
Location: Eastern Ontario | I didn't know you had water in Arizona let alone muskies. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 705
Location: Alex or Alek? | I caught a lot of mid 40's fish. To me those aren't little fish nor are they big fish......we need a "respectable size fish" option.
4 months tell muskie season....
Edited by MOJOcandy101 1/28/2016 8:10 AM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 32788
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | Geez. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 785
| Haha I'm sure it's all relative. This year was numbers numbers numbers with a few big ones mixed in. Tons of 42ish fish. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 132
| MOJOcandy101 - 1/28/2016 8:09 AM
I caught a lot of mid 40's fish. To me those aren't little fish nor are they big fish......we need a "respectable size fish" option.
4 months tell muskie season....
Or... I didn't catch many fish and they were all small so I don't have an option because the only option is "a ton of little fish". |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1425
Location: St. Lawrence River | Terrible options lol I think your just trolling at this point with these polls! :p |
|
| |
|
Posts: 400
Location: Metro | I would say that I only caught one small fish this past year (2015). That fish was a 37.5. All of my other fish were above 45. God I cant wait to get back out on open water! 4 months.... |
|
| |
|
Posts: 470
| Most were what I'd call medium (40-44") with A few Large (48"+) and a couple smaller (>40"). Smallest was 29".
I kept notes if anyone gives a poop....
RandalB |
|
| |
|
Posts: 394
Location: WI | I'm waiting for the "zip, zero, zilch, nada, squat, should've stuck to walleye fishing $5000 ago" option  But this year will be THE year, I just know it.... |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2752
Location: Mauston, Wisconsin | Its ambiguous poll, is it fish caught or fish on or # of follows, its not granular enough and it doesn't specify bump board photo's either, so its not going to meet ToddM's standards......really do you care how my 2015 season was?
It was misery with two lost really big fish and zilch for me in the boat. Others caught fish though...and lost some too. I know, define really big! Nope, you wouldn't believe me if I told you.... so lets get on with winternet!
Have fun!
Al
Edited by ESOX Maniac 1/30/2016 8:59 AM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 347
Location: Vilas County, WI | Emptynet - 1/29/2016 9:11 PM
I'm waiting for the "zip, zero, zilch, nada, squat, should've stuck to walleye fishing $5000 ago" option But this year will be THE year, I just know it....
Agreed. My vote would have been '$#*tty year' |
|
| |
|
Posts: 155
| I would say smaller average size, with a few dandy's mixed in! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1767
Location: Lake Country, Wisconsin | T.Carlson - 1/31/2016 7:56 AM
I would say smaller average size, with a few dandy's mixed in!
That's what she said! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 155
| Musky Brian - 1/31/2016 10:41 AM
T.Carlson - 1/31/2016 7:56 AM
I would say smaller average size, with a few dandy's mixed in!
That's what she said!
HAHA!! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1663
Location: Kodiak, AK | Need an option for "my state doesn't even have muskies."
I'm jealous of you guys with tons of tiny fish. I haven't caught a muskie since 2012. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1969
| Do you get up and fish the tributaries of the Yukon? ..45"+ Pike on the fly - isn't a bad alternative - I love watching big gators attack a fly!!! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1663
Location: Kodiak, AK | IAJustin - 2/8/2016 1:45 PM Do you get up and fish the tributaries of the Yukon? ..45"+ Pike on the fly - isn't a bad alternative - I love watching big gators attack a fly!!! :) Nah, I'm 1200 miles from Whitehorse. There's big pike in the interior of the state, but none on Kodiak. I'm thinking of doing an interior pike and sheefish trip sometime if I don't get drawn for any decent hunts this year.
|
|
| |
