Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> Lures,Tackle, and Equipment -> Is 100# Braid needed anymore?
 
Message Subject: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?
jlong
Posted 12/2/2016 3:44 PM (#837895)
Subject: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Posts: 1937


Location: Black Creek, WI

Back when Pounders first came out, I tossed a few into the lake via broken line during casting.  I was using 80# braid.  Switching to 100# Braid eliminated that problem.

Fast forward a few years and I still haven't donated a Pounder to the musky gods from line failure.  However, there are fewer options for 100# braid on the market.  I'm curious with all the advancements in braid technology if 80# is now adequate for big rubber.... or is 80# still 80#? 

Fishysam
Posted 12/2/2016 4:00 PM (#837901 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 1209


I say 80 is fine. I can cast a pounder all day on 20# and never have an issue. You skills have improved and you don't get backlashes anymore correct? No backlash = no "snaplash" maybe on a rod that a newbie will barrow 100 is still good idea
monsterlures
Posted 12/2/2016 5:41 PM (#837910 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 253


More of a personal thing really
I do use 80lb on my pounder setup but refuse to go under 120 lb for my 2pounder setup
jdsplasher
Posted 12/2/2016 6:46 PM (#837916 - in reply to #837910)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Posts: 2236


Location: SE, WI.

IMO! I think the improvements to line is tighter weaves and thinner diameters . therefore, for the presentations with the pounders, plastics, I'd go with the 100lb. Smaller diameters is not really what  you want here!

 JD

tackleaddict
Posted 12/2/2016 7:08 PM (#837919 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 431


I watched a lure fly into the lake last weekend from an experienced guy. Wasn't even a pounder it was a big tube. Not sure of the weight but no where near a pound.
VMS
Posted 12/2/2016 7:57 PM (#837920 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Posts: 3472


Location: Elk River, Minnesota
I think the 80 pound is 80 pound give or take a pound or 2. I have not thrown pounders but I do throw the magnums a lot... I have noticed with multiple brands (all 80 pound) that they fray with use of the bulldawgs. I have not had a break off with any of them within that time, throwing through the day. I retie a bit more often with them, though..

In my humble opinion, I have not found a line that doesn't fray after some use and being 80 pound, seems to be a non-issue at this point from my personal experience...

Brands I've personally tried: Suffix 832, TUF Line XP, Powerpro, Masterbraid.

Knowing your years of experience on the water, you are very familiar with the fact we all get to "check our line" with a professional overrun now and then...

Steve
Musky Face
Posted 12/2/2016 8:20 PM (#837924 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 558


I'll throw pounders all fall with 80#. No problems ever. Yeah i snap 1 or 2 off in the past, but they where wild cast just f in around. Won't make that mistake again. Shouldn't need 100 unless your unsure of yourself.
Tackle Industries
Posted 12/3/2016 3:28 PM (#837962 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Posts: 4053


Location: Land of the Musky
I went to 130# on everything. Not really about he extra # but its SO much easier to get a birds nest out
Landry
Posted 12/3/2016 7:06 PM (#837971 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 1023


I think 100 is perfect.
Musky Face
Posted 12/3/2016 7:29 PM (#837974 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 558


With 80# you bring in more line per crank. Doesn't matter in the fall, but in the spring, summer you will benefit from it.
Tackle Industries
Posted 12/4/2016 10:17 AM (#837996 - in reply to #837974)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Posts: 4053


Location: Land of the Musky
Musky Face - 12/3/2016 7:29 PM

With 80# you bring in more line per crank. Doesn't matter in the fall, but in the spring, summer you will benefit from it.


Technically no, it wont't. Example, larger diameter line (using 100# vs smaller dia 80# line) will increase your spool diameter faster and thus with every crank, your spool will bring in more line with larger dia line as the diameter of the "spool" with line will increase faster. The gears in the reel never change so that is the constant in the equation. Not about to post the equation. LOL that is a calculus differential equation and I swore that off 30 years ago yuck!
Zinox
Posted 12/4/2016 10:29 AM (#837998 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 1100


Im with musky face, but imo it don't make enough of a difference in the real world use, for me to care much about it.

But the smaller line diameter have a higher average IPT then the think line.
Imagine if you have a line with a infinitely thin diameter you will have maximum IPT all the way in.
If your empty your spool 100% on a cast, and fill it up 100% during the retrieve, you will have a lower average then the previous example.

Btw i mainly use 100lb.
jlong
Posted 12/5/2016 9:01 AM (#838063 - in reply to #837998)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Posts: 1937


Location: Black Creek, WI
I've been using TUF XP 100#.  Are there better options out there?
IAJustin
Posted 12/5/2016 10:26 AM (#838076 - in reply to #838063)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 1971


Cortland Masterbraid 100# goes on my heavy rubber reels.
Zib
Posted 12/5/2016 10:40 AM (#838078 - in reply to #837974)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Posts: 1405


Location: Detroit River

Musky Face - 12/3/2016 8:29 PM With 80# you bring in more line per crank. Doesn't matter in the fall, but in the spring, summer you will benefit from it.

Yep that is true. I have tested this with 80# & 100# PP on the same reel (Okuma Komodo) in my back yard. The difference is very small but there is a difference. I was originally testing the spec that the Komodo pulled in 31" per crank but with 100# test that wasn't the case. With exactly 100' of line out the difference between 80# & 100# was slightly more than 7 more cranks to pull in 100' of line.

Fishysam
Posted 12/5/2016 11:04 AM (#838081 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 1209


Hmm. Curious about a 200' cast per , I'm not sure how far I cast but I'm sure it's more than 100' on a 50 size nacl all the line comes off with 80# that really slows the speed down
Jeff Hanson
Posted 12/5/2016 11:21 AM (#838085 - in reply to #838063)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 937


I still use 100# on my pounder rods and sucker rods.
Hi-seas Grandslam braid is the best that I have used.
Jeff Hanson
madisonmuskyguide.com
DonPursch
Posted 12/5/2016 12:43 PM (#838092 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: RE: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 540


Location: Leech Lake, Walker MN
100 suffix 832 ! It's not about losing a lure it's about leaving it in her face just sayin !!
Tim Kelly
Posted 12/5/2016 1:04 PM (#838095 - in reply to #837996)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Posts: 358


Location: London, England

Tackle Industries - 12/4/2016 4:17 PM
Musky Face - 12/3/2016 7:29 PM With 80# you bring in more line per crank. Doesn't matter in the fall, but in the spring, summer you will benefit from it.
Technically no, it wont't. Example, larger diameter line (using 100# vs smaller dia 80# line) will increase your spool diameter faster and thus with every crank, your spool will bring in more line with larger dia line as the diameter of the "spool" with line will increase faster. The gears in the reel never change so that is the constant in the equation. Not about to post the equation.  that is a calculus differential equation and I swore that off 30 years ago yuck!
 

 

LOL, there's some backwards logic. The diameter increases quicker because it has fallen further. The first cranks of the retrieve will retrieve less 100lb that they would 80lb as the spool is effectively smaller. The last few cranks of each would be similar as both spools will be full. The variance between the retrieve rate of the 100lb will be higher than the 80lb. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RunNGun
Posted 12/5/2016 2:14 PM (#838104 - in reply to #838095)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 132


Tim Kelly - 12/5/2016 1:04 PM

Tackle Industries - 12/4/2016 4:17 PM
Musky Face - 12/3/2016 7:29 PM With 80# you bring in more line per crank. Doesn't matter in the fall, but in the spring, summer you will benefit from it.
Technically no, it wont't. Example, larger diameter line (using 100# vs smaller dia 80# line) will increase your spool diameter faster and thus with every crank, your spool will bring in more line with larger dia line as the diameter of the "spool" with line will increase faster. The gears in the reel never change so that is the constant in the equation. Not about to post the equation.  that is a calculus differential equation and I swore that off 30 years ago yuck!
 

 

LOL, there's some backwards logic. The diameter increases quicker because it has fallen further. The first cranks of the retrieve will retrieve less 100lb that they would 80lb as the spool is effectively smaller. The last few cranks of each would be similar as both spools will be full. The variance between the retrieve rate of the 100lb will be higher than the 80lb. 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Exactly what I was thinking.
jlong
Posted 12/5/2016 2:41 PM (#838110 - in reply to #838092)
Subject: RE: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Posts: 1937


Location: Black Creek, WI
Don, where are you buying 100lb Suffix 832?  I can only find 80# at my typical retailers and online shops.
jlong
Posted 12/5/2016 2:44 PM (#838111 - in reply to #838085)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Posts: 1937


Location: Black Creek, WI

Jeff, where are you buying 100# Hi Seas Grand Slam?  I can only find 80#.

My difficulty finding 100# options is what prompted this post.  Thanks.

Jeff Hanson
Posted 12/5/2016 5:13 PM (#838124 - in reply to #838111)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 937


Hi Jason,
http://www.stealthtackle.net/ carries it on his website
http://www.tackledirect.com/hi-seas-grand-slam-braid-300yds.html has it also.
http://www.afwhiseas.com/Grand-Slam-Braid-Green-300-Yard-Filler-Spo...
Are all places to get it. I usually pick up at shows from Stealth tackle
Jeff Hanson
madisonmuskyguide.com
Zinox
Posted 12/6/2016 1:39 AM (#838159 - in reply to #838110)
Subject: RE: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 1100


jlong - 12/5/2016 2:41 PM

Don, where are you buying 100lb Suffix 832?  I can only find 80# at my typical retailers and online shops.


They make a 99lb its hard to find, but some shops are able to get i home if you ask them.

I'm from Europe so not sure what shops in the state might help.
jlong
Posted 12/6/2016 8:44 AM (#838171 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Posts: 1937


Location: Black Creek, WI
Jeff, thanks for the links!
Muskydanno621
Posted 12/6/2016 11:52 AM (#838192 - in reply to #838171)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 92


Love the cortland master braid in 100 pound. I don't use anything less for rubber anymore. Super quiet but does puff up a bit on the spool late into the fall. Power pro definitely absorbs less water.
figure 8
Posted 12/7/2016 3:48 PM (#838359 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 238


I have had good luck with the hi seas grandslam 100# also I got it on all my reels exept my early spring stuff. Then I got 65#
happy hooker
Posted 12/7/2016 4:40 PM (#838367 - in reply to #838359)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?




Posts: 3136


I don't know if this is coincidence or not but I have casted off my share of big fall baits,,but since using a florocarbon leader I have not lost any and I'm still using the same line and late fall rod that I used with wire leaders,,don't know if the floro gives more or just absorbs better because it's flexible on less then smooth casts,, and my baits have only gotten bigger.
Will Schultz
Posted 12/8/2016 7:49 PM (#841489 - in reply to #837895)
Subject: Re: Is 100# Braid needed anymore?





Location: Grand Rapids, MI
With all the others, yes. Not any more for me though. Sunline FX2, you'll never go back.
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)