Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Ethanol, non ethonol, treated, untreated comparisons

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
VMS
Posted 10/31/2019 11:01 AM (#949222 - in reply to #949220)
Subject: Re: Ethanol, non ethonol, treated, untreated comparisons





Posts: 3475


Location: Elk River, Minnesota
North of 8 - 10/31/2019 10:20 AM

I fill the 30 gallon tank in my Lund each fall but have not done the same on my pontoon with a built in 35 gallon tank. We don't use the pontoon that much and it is amazing how little gas that 90hp four stroke uses at low rpms just putting along. As a result, use less than a tank of gas each season. Which is worse, potential for condensation because of half full tank or gas that sits for that long? Maybe I should be filling the pontoon as well?


Hiya,

I would say the worse of the two would be bad gas. If stabilized, it would be fine. If you are using E10, condensation should never be an issue. Stabilize what you have and put it away.

Steve

Word count above: 39... including "Hiya" and "Steve"



Edited by VMS 10/31/2019 11:05 AM

(Delete all cookies set by this site)