Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Ethanol, non ethonol, treated, untreated comparisons

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
VMS
Posted 10/29/2019 7:49 PM (#949127 - in reply to #948618)
Subject: Re: Ethanol, non ethonol, treated, untreated comparisons





Posts: 3475


Location: Elk River, Minnesota
Hiya,

I am still in research with different stabilizers (see a previous thread on them as I took a quick straw poll on which ones are being used the most and would go that route), but am limited to doing what I would like to do...and that is to actually separate the different liquids in the formulation to figure out just exactly what is in them. Working in a public school and trying to separate liquids via boiling point is a tough sell with such volatile compounds and permission to do so is not going to be something easy to obtain. I'm not giving up, though, and will hopefully have something in the future to share.

I too am one with this subject in particular that I take seriously as well. To be honest, I too was on the premium non-ethanol fuel side at one point until I started questioning why use it when my outboard says E10 is fine. THAT is where my research started. I don't claim to be any sort of expert on this stuff, but I am going to ensure I am informed on any stance I take and I am going to make darn sure I can justify that stance.

Steve

(Delete all cookies set by this site)