Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: terrova Q's

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Muskers
Posted 5/10/2017 7:18 AM (#861268 - in reply to #861229)
Subject: Re: terrova Q's




Posts: 325


Location: Otsego, MN
I run lowrance from my Terrova and do feel as though the transducer built into the Terrova is poor in comparison to the standard HDS transducers. It works and I don't get interference but you definitely don't have the 2D details. I am confident the depth reading is accurate but for locating small weeds and bottom contours like rocks, gravel, sand, muck, etc. I only rely on my rear unit or structure scan. Just depends on how you want to use it. I use it for depth, speed and mapping up front so it works great!

(Delete all cookies set by this site)