Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Posting a reply to: Re: Side imaging question

Back
Muskie Fishing -> Muskie Boats and Motors
Guest name
Subject
Message

Emoticons
HTML: Yes
Anonymous: Yes
MBBS Code: Yes


 Disable HTML
Post anonymously
Enable emoticons



hi


You are replying to:
Kirby Budrow
Posted 7/17/2023 8:09 AM (#1022337 - in reply to #1022288)
Subject: Re: Side imaging question





Posts: 2280


Location: Chisholm, MN
ToddM - 7/15/2023 10:21 AM

Masqui-ninja - 7/15/2023 9:26 AM

The GT56 is 10X better than the GT54.


I have the 54 and everything I read says there's no difference between that and the 56 in less than 30ft. The lowrance is about 150 cheaper but I'm just wondering if the triple shot has improved over the version I have which I'd definitely no where near close to the Garmin with the 54.


I don't use garmin SI so take this or what it's worth but I don't think the reviews from bass/walleye guys mean much for muskie guys. They are mainly seeing structure. Muskie guys want to see images of fish. You can see structure with both of them but seeing a clearer image of a muskie would be a lot better with the 56.

(Delete all cookies set by this site)