|
|
| I could use a new PB as the current one is getting old...where do you think the largest musky on earth currently swims? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1039
Location: North St. Paul, MN | 2003 and counting, Joe. Not looking good either as I can't tear myself away from the small rivers...
However, in 2005 I saw "her"...eastern Lac Seul. I'll say there.
Edited by muskyroller 7/10/2017 2:20 PM
|
|
| |
|
Location: Contrarian Island | so many choices, but I'd suspect in the great lakes somewhere...GB, or out east. Don't discount a 60 x super fat being in mille lacs either
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 20178
Location: oswego, il | You must be after the mighty and elusive shoepack musky! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1220
| Why not LCO? Worked before! |
|
| |
|
| right now goergian bay in a near future i'll go with champlain lake and st-john river |
|
| |
|
Posts: 293
Location: Sakatchewan,Canada | Another vote for Georgian Bay. Past, present and future! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1425
Location: St. Lawrence River | Pelagic fish swimming out in a great lake. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 735
Location: Apparently where the Muskie aren't | Hopefully LOTW, lac Seul, or Ottawa river because I plan on (hopefully) making a trip to one of those next year. If I catch the record I can assure you nodody will be finding out about it. I would get good photos that without a doubt prove it as a record but there is no way I'd go public about it, and I honestly think a lot of other Muskie guys feel the same way (maybe not).
But, I can assure you, that if I pull a record bass out of somewhere you will see me on the cover of some fishing magazine |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1425
Location: St. Lawrence River | Musky_Mo16 - 7/10/2017 6:07 PM
Hopefully LOTW, lac Seul, or Ottawa river because I plan on (hopefully) making a trip to one of those next year. If I catch the record I can assure you nodody will be finding out about it. I would get good photos that without a doubt prove it as a record but there is no way I'd go public about it, and I honestly think a lot of other Muskie guys feel the same way (maybe not).
But, I can assure you, that if I pull a record bass out of somewhere you will see me on the cover of some fishing magazine
I would guess no, no, and probably not. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 735
Location: Apparently where the Muskie aren't | JakeStCroixSkis - 7/10/2017 5:41 PM
Musky_Mo16 - 7/10/2017 6:07 PM
Hopefully LOTW, lac Seul, or Ottawa river because I plan on (hopefully) making a trip to one of those next year. If I catch the record I can assure you nodody will be finding out about it. I would get good photos that without a doubt prove it as a record but there is no way I'd go public about it, and I honestly think a lot of other Muskie guys feel the same way (maybe not).
But, I can assure you, that if I pull a record bass out of somewhere you will see me on the cover of some fishing magazine
I would guess no, no, and probably not.
Is that a no to the lakes or to me on a magazine lol |
|
| |
|
Posts: 251
| I would focus on catching one before worrying about a record  |
|
| |
|
Posts: 735
Location: Apparently where the Muskie aren't | kdebell - 7/10/2017 6:23 PM
I would focus on catching one before worrying about a record :)
Hey, just saying. Last time I checked there was no levels in Muskie fishing. It's not required to catch 1 before you catch the record. I wasn't planning a trophy trip either just, some lakes that I could enjoy the whole experience at and not see water skiers every 3 min. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1209
| Then go north |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1080
Location: Aurora | Wabigoon |
|
| |
|
| yeah lac seul produce some big fish sometimes
https://youtu.be/LPSChkufrdg |
|
| |
|
Posts: 770
| My bet would be mille lacs, although i would rather spens a week at lac suel |
|
| |
|
Posts: 114
| The Musky Boys sum things up rather well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLfySPMdprU |
|
| |
|
Posts: 101
Location: Niagara on the Lake, ON | Seul would be cool...Id say the Larry has as good a chance as any. Im sure it could come out of a lot of spots |
|
| |
|
Posts: 718
| Deep and pelagic. |
|
| |
|
Location: Contrarian Island | that's 63 inches? hmmm interesting..  |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1275
Location: Hayward, Wisconsin | Junkman: "Why not LCO? Worked before!"
LR: Or it didn't... |
|
| |
|
Posts: 4269
Location: Ashland WI | Larry Ramsell - 8/8/2018 8:02 AM
Junkman: "Why not LCO? Worked before!"
LR: Or it didn't...
Correct, everyone knows it was the "big chip"... |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1636
| Lac Seul would be my pick. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 452
| Georgian Bay, St. Lawrence or Ottawa Rivers. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 591
Location: Duluth | St. Lawrence, or one of the many burgeoning new spots on the GL in WI/MN and MI as a result of stocking. Come fall someone is going to stick a fatty that has been out on the lake gorging itself with fatty fish. |
|
| |
|
Location: Contrarian Island | Green bay has the potential, Mille Lacs for sure has it. I don't really think Lac Seul does. I mean it has been fished for how long and really what is the biggest legit fish to come from it? I think they top out there smaller than other places. but who knows. it's fun to think about what swims in lakes like Seul. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 323
Location: Elk River, MN | St lawrence, Green Bay, Great Lakes somewhere, Mille Lacs for sure. Couple of 58/59" fish been washing up the last few years |
|
| |
|
Posts: 397
Location: Wisconsin | St. Lawrence... The waters of Lac Des deux montagnes & Lac st-louis... if there is a true world record, its my bet they are in there |
|
| |
|
Location: ontario | georgian bay or st. lawrence |
|
| |
