|
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | So much for global warming, this spring is the coldest of the last 15 years for us Wisconsinites, how about you? Local farmers have been delayed long enough from their spring plowing in preparation for the planting season and it doesn’t look like it will get better anytime real soon. So what does that mean for those of us, at least here in the southeastern portion of Wisconsin who are waiting on our tippy-toes for May 7th to show up so we can finally cure our restlessness for Musky fishing? I spent a morning overlooking an alfalfa field waiting on a turkey only to review pictures from this time last year versus how the field looked this year and the difference was tremendous. Last year showed plush green alfalfa over my ankles be mid-April, but this year the field looked more like an abused lawn with mud everywhere and only sparse new growth from this year’s crop. So how does that relate to musky fishing? One thing is certain, if the plants aren’t growing and the trees are barely budding above water, green growth below the lakes surface is sure to be trailing slowly behind and I proved this to myself on a recent crappie trip out my backdoor on a small lake here in Waukesha County. What’s more to this late blossoming spring is the cold water we’ve remained steady at since late March. Where the 2010 Gamefish season showed us upper 50’s to low 60’s in the Lake Country area of SE Wisconsin, the current water temps on these same lakes hasn’t breached the 50 degree mark yet – burrrr. Guess I’m expecting a few more of the bigger females caught this opener versus seasons of old as I think the spawn hasn’t so much been delayed as it has been stretched out. It should be interesting out there, to say the least… I think a lot of angry protective males will be chasing. Thoughts? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1036
| Slow and shallow man, slow and shallow.
Imagine what the musky opener up north is going to look like if this weather pattern holds to Memorial Day...... |
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | I hear there's still ice skimming 60% of the lakes up there... Ouch!
Edited by Sam Ubl 4/27/2011 9:21 AM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 19
| How is water clarity going to be? Living on the west end of P and as of now clarity is less then half a foot |
|
| |
|
| The phenomenon can not be labeled as global warming, but rather global climate change. The fact that you have noticed such a dramatic climatic difference between two subsequent years (be it hot or cold), and indeed through the past eight to ten years, is testament to this theory. How the local aquatic ecosystems react, well, that's another theory best left to time. Politics. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 32903
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | Most lakes are open in the Rhinelander area today. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 146
Location: where the fish are... | We have just not been fortunate enough to have a sustained warming trend this spring. Here in northern IL we are still seeing low 50 degree water temps but they have been up to 54 and then back to 48 and now they are slowly rising. Oh well I guess it will make for an interesting season. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 200
Location: Minnesota | vegas492 - 4/27/2011 9:10 AM
Slow and shallow man, slow and shallow.
That's NOT what she said . . .
I'm in MN and I have to wait until June 4. It should be plenty warm by then. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 968
Location: N.FIB | I would rather see it colder than warmer so temps take longer to get to 80,otherwise we will have to stop fishing in s wis by mid july again,colder temps will make for a better sucker bite. |
|
| |
|
| Guest - 4/27/2011 9:29 AM
The phenomenon can not be labeled as global warming, but rather global climate change. The fact that you have noticed such a dramatic climatic difference between two subsequent years (be it hot or cold), and indeed through the past eight to ten years, is testament to this theory. How the local aquatic ecosystems react, well, that's another theory best left to time. Politics.
Really we have global climate change? Brilliant! if there wasn't the entire state would still be covered under 150 feet of ice. Last spring was warmer than normal this one is cooler - hmm the two years = historical averages...this is nothing new...global climate change LOL |
|
| |
|
| Timber, timber, timber nuff said
Global climate change, wow, brilliant. Thats like when davey nelson said during a brewers game. "if he throws another ball on this 2-2 count, the count will be full"
heres your sign |
|
| |
|
Posts: 999
| Last year's northern opener we were greeted with 70 water temps and mid summer patterns! Each year is different, there is no trend leading one way or the other. I dont believe in that climate change stuff. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1030
Location: APPLETON, WI | I blame Obama for these unseasonally colder temps. Definitely his fault.
Slow 'n shallow for me, as well. I've been reviewing a map of the lake I'm hitting on opening weekend and I've got some ideas. I didn't say they were good ideas yet... I just said, I've got some ideas. We'll see how they pan out. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1916
Location: Greenfield, WI | DH Buc is up at his cottage to supposedly put his dock and shore station in Crescent Lake in Oneida County. It has open water 20-30' wide along shore. It is like playing Russian Roulette as if he puts the pier in and the wind picks up, very bad things can happen to the pier sections!
The real sad part is that there were a pair of loons swimming in that area. I hope that they brought fish sandwiches to eat!
Edited by Steve Van Lieshout 4/27/2011 5:50 PM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 153
| I stopped in at Smokey's yesterday on Pewaukee and looked in the water. It looks milky pea green with visibilty to about one foot. Sure hope it clears up soon. Didn't get a chance to go to the west end boat launch to see if the water was any clearer. Here's hoping! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 4080
Location: Elko - Lake Vermilion | Ice still covers Big V, but is starting to pull back from the shore... Yesterday I saw about 6 deer out on the lake by Spring Bay,... And today we got 4" of wet snow in Virgina and Hibbing........ What a sick joke!
Jerome |
|
| |
|
Posts: 880
Location: New Berlin,Wisconsin,53151 | Can you say suckers.....what are they going for now. Last fall we're paying 7-8 dollars ea. It is going to be a weird start though, I'm probably the least prepared than I've ever been. The pier isn't in and all the lure haven't been gone over. I still have a couple of reels that need work, not to mention the boat. Batteries have to go in and it hasn't even seen the water yet. Weird start for this guy......
Netman |
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | Just don't wind up in the emergency room the night before the opener like my good friend, James Formolo, who couldn't stop playing with his lures in anticipation and eventually drove one home past the barb in his hand... lol, that's the best kind of sucks! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1916
Location: Greenfield, WI | The ice went out completely on Crescent Lake.
The dock is in, the shorestation will be in today.
Life is good! |
|
| |
|
| One cold spring in Wisconsin doesn't mean anything. The entire south has been under extreme heat for most of the spring. 2011 is set to be one of the top 10 hottest years ever recorded. Parts of northern Canada have been having an unusually warm spring. It really cracks me up when I hear people say "So much for global warming" and stuff like that after a snow storm or something. It just shows you how shallow they are. Slow and shallow. Yup, you got that right! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2515
Location: Waukesha & Land O Lakes, WI | I was up in Northern Wis less than weeks ago to get the boats and gear ready while also putting my ice fishing stuff away...while it was cold and we got 8" of snow the lake was slowly creeping open...and this week, the ice was gone.
I have a feeling this walleye opener in NE Wis will be a mixed bag of ugliness, just like most have been for the last 15 years.
Attachments
----------------
 Palmer2.jpg (83KB - 159 downloads)
April Snow.jpg (82KB - 161 downloads)
|
|
| |
|
| ManBearPig? Are you cereal? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1030
Location: APPLETON, WI | guest - 4/28/2011 1:57 PM ...2011 is set to be one of the top 10 hottest years ever recorded. Hahahahahahahahahaha. Ladies & Gentlemen, our brand new, idiot-savant, online, board-certified, muskie first meteorologist! And for his next trick, he's going to stop hiding behind that guest moniker and grow a pair of balls! Step right up, folks and watch 'em grow! 
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 416
Location: Madtown, WI | Yep, it was a cold April in Wisconsin. Therefore we obviously can draw the conclusion that all that global warming talk was baloney. I mean jeez, look at the alfalfa!
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/science/01/22/nasa.warmest.decade.data... |
|
| |
|
Posts: 32
Location: Janesville, Wi | I really don't mid the cooler water temps for the opener as long as we are not looking at a cooling trend. Supposed to start warming up tomorrow. As long as the water temps are are rising we all will be OK. Sam always whack a ton of fish on P he's da man on that lake. I do better O. Hit Illinois up for a few fish this spring already. I has been cool down there too but every time the water temps were rising a degree or two the fish ate. Good luck too all. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 19
| west end of Pewaukee has cleared up a lot the past few days, water temperature...cold. |
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | Seth, I'll hold your hand through this one.. The Global Warming comment was a figure of speech and not intended to start a discussion about annual climate trends. No need to form enemies through your buff keyboard  Oh, and not to add more insult to injury, but I'll return the favor of adding a URL hyperlink that YOU should check out: It's all in the title - the actual article is as worthless as your last comments
http://charlestonteaparty.org/climate-geek-moment/
Plain and simple, it's been cold and the water temps are still way down from this time last year and in many years past so how we attack the water is the crucial factor between the two different sides of the fence; success or failure.
I remember a couple years ago when we had a very warm spring in SE WI and the fish were definitely in post spawn mode. The males remained in the shallows for nearly two weeks after opener in great numbers. The panfish had a reason to hug warm shallow bays in quantities I've never before seen on one particular body of water and it just so happened to be full of defensive males still protective of their spawn sites. For the first several days of the season, the amount of belly up panfish in this particular area were so many one would think chemicals from the green lawns on shore were poisoning these fish, but if you were privvy to the reality of the situation, you were well aware that these belly up, half-dead bluegill and crappie were victims of aggression from the musky in the area. If you spent enough time in this area, you would have seen muskies darting around scattering schools of these panfish and now and again another one would come to the surface, only to try swimming disoriented spirals back down and then float back up. None of these panfish had bite marks...
Minor lesson learned was that these protective males weren't hunting these panfish, they were 'nosing' them with their mouths closed - literally ramming into them and disorienting them with what I assume was intended to force these panfish away from their spawn sites like a smallie protects its bed, but it wasn't working. The weather conditions building up to this week hatched some serious zooplankton, and in turn came several layers of the food chain starting at the bottom. To consistently produce in this area for that first week or so of the season you couldn't throw just anything in here, you had to stir the pot. The panfish were getting harrassed just suspending in a non-mobile shool just for being in the area, but to get bit you had to really P-off the musky. We found success in two ways: 1) while they were protective, they also have to eat, so immitating the wounded was key here. Let the twitch bait sit on the surface and dead stick it back. 2) Make your bait a few enemies by ripping up weeds, pulling it through the schools of the very panfish you were immitating and crashing it into the bottom and stirring up silt - watch your bait get literally smoked!
Success for that first half of May depended greatly on being aware of the past weather trends and understanding how, a) the food chain reacts to these conditions, and b) how water temps and weather conditions affected the mood and nature of our favorite quarry. Discussing this years current conditions is the intent of this thread... Not if the world is truly melting or not 
Edited by Sam Ubl 4/29/2011 9:19 AM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 200
Location: Minnesota | Guest - 4/28/2011 4:34 PM
ManBearPig? Are you cereal?
Sooper cereal. |
|
| |
|
| Sam,
Can you expand on what you mean by "protective?" Muskies are broadcast spawners and do not exhibit parental care as male centrarchids do (smallmouths, largemouths, bluegills, etc.). |
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | Males are the first to the shallows to locate a spawning site and hold down the fort until the female comes in, drops and heads back out to recover. Meanwhile, the males will stick around generally a couple of weeks to protect those spawning sites. This is where spawning scars come from on many of those males you catch early on in the season, aggressiveness in protecting their general area where their holding down the fort, so to speak. My reference to smallies protecting their bedswas a little vague to my point, but was intended to suggest the intensity behind their agression during these times, not so much to refer to protecting a said, "bed".
So while they may not 'herd' a cloud of fry like a male smallie will do after they hatch, they do innately protect the general spawning area. Survival of the fittest - luckily in the particular lake I was referring to, Pike aren't of much competition. For that reason I imagine these muskies in this lake are apt to spawning as shallow as they do there versus spawning depths of water sharing competitive forces of Pike and Musky. I have to believe it IS innate, as I said before, to protect these areas from the likes of carp muddying up the areas and suffocating the eggs, as well as keep other fish away from the area to give the eggs a chance, and so on..
This may also be a light bulb to why the early spring yields so many follows from the "in the 30's" males that rarely convert on the follow in that first week or two. Maybe their following away from their basecamp to make sure your 'lure' is going away - may not be a bad idea to pause and make that follower think your lure is considering turning around to go back into the protected area.... give it a good hard twitch to fishtale the lure out as if it were turning around and see if that doesn't instigate a reactive and aggressive strike.?.?
Edited by Sam Ubl 4/29/2011 11:25 AM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 2024
| I've never heard of the behavior you're describing. If you have a source where that information came from, I'd love to read it. Biologists consider muskellunge broadcast spawners: swim along shorelines and deposit eggs and milt without care for the young. The trade-off is that a relatively minimal amount of energy is allocated to reproducing, aside from the productions of eggs and sperm. The fitness advantage conferred to esocids using broadcast spawning as a reproductive strategy is that the adults can continue to grow larger and keep producing more and more eggs to account for mortality associated with not parenting the young. The behaviour you're describing is that of parental care (chasing predators, keeping the spawning site clean, etc.).
I'm not doubting your observations of aggressive fish in the shallows (I've seen it), but I don't believe it has anything to do with protection of young during the spawning period. My theory, they may be hungry after having invested so much energy into producing eggs and sperm and could be taking advantage of aggregating centrarchids. Smaller fish have higher metabolisms and need to be in the shallows where the water is warmer and the habitats are more productive which is needed to fuel their metabolisms. Larger fish don't have this thermal constraint and can slink off into deeper, cooler water and eat larger prey. |
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | Sean, I didn't read this out of a book somewhere, it's merely theory in response to your original question I'm basing my experience off of. There's no doubt the males will stick around in the 'spawning areas' for a couple weeks after the females drop and retreat to the depths to recover, but what's the point if not to protect? I believe you misunderstood my reference to carp and keeping them away - I was not suggesting they "keep an area clean" like a bass uses its tail to sweep the beds, but I'm theorizing moreso an instinct to defend areas to prevent anthing negative from happening.
Surely hunger will initiate strikes from the remaining males, but how do you explain the numbers of panfish injured on the surface and the muskies darting aggressively through the schools in two feet of water constantly throughout the day. One would think if this was a feeding frenzy, you could get bit on anything you throw - that wasn't the case.
Ever had a musky hit your top water only to pop it out of the water without getting hooked (like a dolphin noses a beachball). This wasn't a hungry pack of wolves in this shallow bay musky are notorious for spawning in, this was a group of post spawn fish doing something reactive to the enormous amounts of forage suddenly populating their area, hence my theorizing. I'm also not douting your knowledge or facts, but I am curious why post spawners recognizable by their scars on their heads (noses) and backs remain in a small area one could return to the next day or three and draw a follow from? We're talking post spawn here, so I imagine the shoreline cruising of milting without care may not have been a factor any longer - do you agree? What I'm most interested in is a biologists perspective as to the purpose of the males sticking around after the females deposit their eggs... Or is it merely 'in case' a secondary spawn occurs from females who postponed laying their eggs?
My opinions, observations, what have you, aren't gospel by anyones means, but it strives to the initial point of this thread - to get the wheels upstairs turning. I digress, perhaps if "protection" isn't an accurate description, perhaps "competative" is the correct terminology? Assumably there is competition during the spawn, and perhaps afterwards - you tell us as I know I am at least interested in hearing a biologists perspective.
In either case, these musky weren't out there to consume everything they were attacking, more so acting like a couple of dogs nipping at each other, so to speak. One way or another, there's a lesson to be learned here. Shed some more light
Edited by Sam Ubl 4/29/2011 12:11 PM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 1996
Location: Pelican Lake/Three Lakes Chain | Sam Ubl - 4/29/2011 11:58 AM
Sean, I didn't read this out of a book somewhere, it's merely theory in response to your original question I'm basing my experience off of. There's no doubt the males will stick around in the 'spawning areas' for a couple weeks after the females drop and retreat to the depths to recover, but what's the point if not to protect?
The same reason males of our species hang out at bars at 2 am, hoping that the last known spawning female may come in and be his.
If there is food there and the water temps are in their comfort range the males will hang around, but it has nothing to do with protecting the spawning area.
Edited by nwild 4/29/2011 12:09 PM
|
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | Norm - point taken. So we've decided my theory was farse as an explanation and I'm fine with that - let's learn, but then again, I can't agree that we men hang at bars waiting on the last available girl looking to mate walking in, meanwhile punching out everyone that gets near us, big or little... I can agree that the first bit, though. So, back to square one - why were these males so aggressive towards any and everything in that shallow bay, in particular, panfish? Is it the big man syndrome, who beats any and everyone in his path up?
I suppose some may settle for "it was what it was", but then again, those may be the ones who throw dbl 10's all day long because someone said they were great on TV or the web... You don't become a better fisherman be settling, you become good when you innately reflect on the why's behind your success (why,when and where) after a couple high fives and a photo.
We can assume with the consistent cold spring we've had this year in the upper midwest, at least in Wisconsin, spawning will be delayed some measurable be the water temps barely excedding the mid-40 degree mark as of yet. So how do we anticipate plan A, plan B and plan C? Based on the idea that the spawn will extend into the season this year, I'm assuming females will be frequenting the shallows more so than seasons of old to drop their eggs, making for more sightings and hook ups IMO. Suppose my next thoughts would be, plan A) Go bigger than traditional spring tackle, plan B) downsize, plan C) Move out and check the breaks.
Edited by Sam Ubl 4/29/2011 12:23 PM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 1996
Location: Pelican Lake/Three Lakes Chain | The aggressive behavior toward the panfish can be explained quite simply by the fact that the panfish are food.
Hitting them with closed mouths and seemingly little interest is not a spring only phenomenon. It happens spring, summer, and fall, and both sexes do it. It is quite frustrating when the big females do it and dash all of one's CPR hopes.
Why do they do it, the same reason they follow, porpoise, sun themselves and make our hearts beat at three times the normal rate. Because they are muskies and its what they do. I know that explains very little, but the only ones that know for sure are the fish, and none of them that I have asked have told me.
Edited by nwild 4/29/2011 12:23 PM
|
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | Good progression of breaking down the phenomenon (if we can call it that). Disorient the forage with huge blows with a closed snout, return to finish the job after the hard part is over, sure, I can understand that, but it still seems a little intense for worn out post spawners who've been through those rigors, but I'm not discounting it. In fact, this particular instance may have proven itself true by one of the two tactics we employed of deadsticking a slammer twitch bait with patience.
"Splash down... twitch twitch twitch... let her float for a full minute or so... repeat" BINGO!! Technique did score us a couple fish. So, is this the final answer?
I understand your humor, Norm, but I'm trying to think like a fish here. Here's a BST as to why musky will porpoise; a quick expultion of air after feeding in the depths? I rarely see fish porpois in the shallows, it's most always in some depth. Airblatters MAY have something to do with feeding deep, and perhaps porpoising provides some relief? Another theory. Sunning themselves may have to do with similarity. Can we agree musky will seek out warmer water to increase their metabolism, and in part, increase their digestion? May be a theory behind why the lazy follows in the summertime shallows - in innate reaction to follow the prey, but not room to eat or maybe too much discomfort yet? |
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | I'll add, if it's not the intent to discuss and reveal theory on this site, I suppose I missed the point of creating a user account. Assumedly, nearly 2,000 views of this thread and only 36 posts reveal some are interested in hearing more and getting something to think about. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2691
Location: Pewaukee, Wisconsin | Sam I love the fact you can take a shot or two and keep posting. Guys like you keep this site interesting. It also keeps people comming back and checking out the subjects. I see the same crazy stuff going on each spring in the shallows. I believe most of the agression moves is just the males all wound up looking for some love. Even the bigger females will bolt around and come back. They just don't like the fact that a boat is close. They stir up the water with a bunch of bursts of speed and turns but usually will come rite back to that general area. It seems like the males are all over the areas but "with bar time close" they are always looking for one last girl to rub up against.
This spring I believe we will see more big fish shallow and lots of active males. Every Opener is a little different and this one will be "a weird one" like you posted. If the wind is on the ligh side we will enjoy all the muskies we will see shallow. Getting them to eat is the trick. My tactics will be targeting the agressive males early then try for a few of the big girls as the heat of the afternoon sets in.
Keep on posting my friend. Its good content and gets responces. After all, thats what this site is for.
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 267
| Sam, thanks for your thought provoking posts. Keep 'em coming. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1168
| Not all fish spawn at the same time. If spawning "turns off" fish then why not go after the ones that are not doing their thing?
I'm stoked about the cold weather we've been having. It could be challenging but it also opens many, many doors for a little more of the outside the box, putting BST's into action type of mindset. It will be different than last year but last year was the exception, not the rule. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1906
Location: Oconto Falls, WI | Too many people are slaves of water temp! Go with the flow. If the fish aren't shallow, go elsewhere. If they aren't deep, then go in between. If they aren't active somewhere but are found there still look elsewhere.
But by all means don't fish any South shores! They are always the coldest. You must fish the north end of lakes.
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 272
| I need to figure out how to train the fish to hang around their nesting locations by me. Usually its a "spawn and gone" around here.
This spring opener, if I were fishing my historical inland lakes, I'd be targeting current areas...... creek inlets and outlets. Muskies are a river fish, they seem to like that environment and they may be returning to the lake via the creek channel from a spawning marsh or another lake upstream. They'll always hang around creek inlets and outlets anyway, and an increased flow always attracts fish. With the wet, late year we're having, I'd say your best odds are near a "warm" stream entering a cold lake if the fish are post spawn.
Muskies are attracted by increases in current, and with the periods of rain we keep having, that may play in this spring. Either way, creek inlets will provide current and temperature differences.....in addition to all the other things creek inlets/outlets provide at any day throughout the year.
-Eric
Edited by muskie-addict 5/3/2011 7:18 AM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 3155
| if there ever was a year to go fish canada trout water on opener this is it!!!
the fish will all still be shallow,could be the best canada opener ever on the clear stuff |
|
| |
|
Posts: 999
| Dennis Radloff hit it on the head tonite at the C&R club meeting stating that this could be one of those rare years that the mega giants will be seen up shallow! Most years their in and out before opener. Could be exciting! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2691
Location: Pewaukee, Wisconsin | I agree with Dennis. The big girls will still be shallow. Also I think there will be a lot of males shallow. Lots of muskies to be had on late Spring openers. I can't wait to set the hook into some ski's........ |
|
| |
|
Posts: 582
| global warming...good one... the biggest myth forced on this earth ever. What we are seeing is a La Nina spring. Nothing more, nothing less. It happens just like this in other La Nina years. The opening will be different that is for sure. I say the spawning will take more time this year. |
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin |
To : Sam Ubl
Date : 5/3/2011 10:54
PMSubject : Global warming
"It is still called GLOBAL Warming, not Wisconsin warming. In other words, it's an average of GLOBAL temperatures. Have a great day." - Kazmuskie
... Soooo, to anyone else who needs their hand held here, it was meant as a figure of speech to start the thread, so as to NOT BE TAKEN LITERALLY. These kind of PM's I've been getting from climate geeks are really goofy..
What you'll find more and more is that less and less quality posts will hit the boards to avoid the garbage. If you use this site for what it's intended for, don't push away what draws you in, in the first place. |
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | So how many are straying from the 'in spring, go small' mindset and opting for the 'go big or go home'? If the presence of bigger females making themselves vulnerable proves out, I'm going to plan on upsizing my aresenal assuming these fish will be looking for a bigger, easier meal.. Maybe I'll take that 9" Suick for a walk and break out the Mag Shallow Dawg for its first swim of the season.. I may even Weagle it 
Edited by Sam Ubl 5/4/2011 11:02 AM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 1906
Location: Oconto Falls, WI | Something to think about.
For those hoping to contact BIG females getting ready to spawn. Why was it frowned upon a few years ago when a certain someone back-doored an earlier musky season north of 10, but it appears everyone is ok with targeting spawning fish south of 10?
I’m just saying.
|
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | Travis, I hear what your saying although I'm not familiar with the past reference you speak of. The direction this topic is going is sure to ignite personal opinions like wildfire, but when I think of spawning fish being harrassed, I think of cherry-picked bass and panfish sitting on beds, not necessarily fish 'going through the motions', especially those 'free love' types like musky. Of course there's the stress factors...
I dunno, think I'm done with the boards for now - time to start fishing |
|
| |
|
Posts: 3242
Location: Racine, Wi | Travis, I think you'll find more acceptance of this south of Hwy 10 as the natural reproduction is not here like it is in the North of the state. Most of the lakes (at least by me) are reliant upon stocking where as up nort you do get natural reproduction in some of those lakes. I think that's where the up roar came from.
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 223
Location: Victoria,MN | I have been following this thread for a few days, and have found this to be interesting reading material. Food for thought I guess...
Thank You! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1906
Location: Oconto Falls, WI | That’s what I figured Joel. However, isn’t stress on a spawning musky still stress regardless if the spawn is successful or not? Isn’t it thought of as bad to target the fish during spawn because of that stress coupled with the stress of a fight possibly killing the fish? So my point is a dead 50” is a dead 50” regardless if it successfully spawned or not. Whether the fish is stocked or not to me is irrelevant. It takes a long time to grow a large fish regardless if they started out naturally or as a stocked fish.
I am not singling you our Sam. I was going to post this with my initial response to the thread. I am also not necessarily saying I agree, or disagree with targeting the fish during spawn. What I am trying to get across is I feel if you think it is wrong in the north, it should also be wrong in the south. I mean is there truly evidence that all the fish in Southern WI do not reproduce?
To me this is a lot like the 80° water temp deal. It’s bad to do it while you are not facing the circumstances, but when you are faced with the time of 80° water temps you don’t practice what you preach. Too many double standards out there with the angling community.
Sorry to get off topic. Just trying to raise awareness, and for everyone to think about what they are doing. If you are fine with it in the south I feel you better be fine with it in the north. Otherwise you might as well just sign every post with “Do as I say, and not as I do”. If you don't agree with me that's fine as you know what they say about opinions...
I am sure I made all kinds of friends today!  |
|
| |
|
Posts: 3242
Location: Racine, Wi | I hear exactly what you're saying Travis, and to tell you the truth, I'm not sure what kind of impact it may or may not have on spawning fish. I know on Pewaukee in particular, the populations don't seem to have been impacted as far as fishing right off the bat in a cold spring when there potentially is more female contact (fish that is)
Also, looking at the Fox Chain in IL which has no closed season, there seems to be a very good population of fish, and some very nice fish as well. I wonder if the cooler water may lessen the stress on the fish this time of the year orrrrrr if there are potentially harmful impacts to the larger females this time of the year when they are spawning and get caught? Would be interesting to hear some thoughts from those that study them, but I think this may be a topic for a different thread. A viable question though that I'd be interested in hearing more about. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 279
| CiscoKid - 5/4/2011 12:05 PM
That’s what I figured Joel. However, isn’t stress on a spawning musky still stress regardless if the spawn is successful or not? Isn’t it thought of as bad to target the fish during spawn because of that stress coupled with the stress of a fight possibly killing the fish?
First this has been a great read for me at work. Look at Indiana Lake Webster the fish don't have successful spawn but they do go thru the process and this lake is fished very hard during these times yet it has a population of around 6 fish per acre so I don't think all that many fish are dying from it. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1169
Location: New Hope MN | Does anyone know if ski's spawn after dark? I hope for their own sake they do. |
|
| |
|
| dtaijo174 - 5/4/2011 3:45 PM
Does anyone know if ski's spawn after dark? I hope for their own sake they do.
I'm guessing if you're on this site, you care for the resource, so I guess we're all treehuggers in that way, but some are hugging a little too tight. . . Would Dtaijo prefer we not fish on the opener?
Catching fish any time of day, night, or season will stress a fish... Tell you what can be done, someone can sign up to count the number of dead musky floating around after the opener and report back so those of you who seem to think catch and proper handle/release of them during the opener is gonna kill them can sleep better at night. Why does it always go "there"? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1906
Location: Oconto Falls, WI | Guest - 5/4/2011 4:44 PM
dtaijo174 - 5/4/2011 3:45 PM
Does anyone know if ski's spawn after dark? I hope for their own sake they do.
I'm guessing if you're on this site, you care for the resource, so I guess we're all treehuggers in that way, but some are hugging a little too tight. . . Would Dtaijo prefer we not fish on the opener?
Catching fish any time of day, night, or season will stress a fish... Tell you what can be done, someone can sign up to count the number of dead musky floating around after the opener and report back so those of you who seem to think catch and proper handle/release of them during the opener is gonna kill them can sleep better at night. Why does it always go "there"?
Like I said I won't mention what my thoughts are in terms of if we should or shouldn't fish for them during the spawn. The answer may surprise you.
Again my point is to those that were all against an early season north of highway 10 need to think about this if they don't think it is wrong south of 10. No one remembers the dislike of this happening and wanted him removed from office, and have (which ahppen) it changed back to the "normal" season opener date up there?
As far as using Indiana as an example that it is fine may not be the right arguement, or it may. I would sure think the stocking rate there is much higher than that of southern WI waters. Note I make this statement being uninformed of the stocking practices at either place. Regardless at 6 fish per acre you can afford to lose some fish and not even notice them gone. It's a bit different at say 1 fish per acre or less (not sure what the S. WI waters are at).
Also, not all fish that die float.
I guess some people don't like it when you plays devil's advocate. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 32903
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | Juat a note, Keith is working Tomahawk this week collecting walleye eggs and the walleyes are hitting peak to just past. He sets nets tomorrow for Muskies, and the few females he's had in the 'eye nets so far have been very ready to spawn, dropping all over the place.
It isn't just water temp that gets 'em going. Bet they've been busy already... |
|
| |
|
Posts: 19
| cant wait for opener, kinda bummed I have to work Sunday all day, but will be giving her on Saturday. Gonna catch me a pewaukee fitty |
|
| |
|
Posts: 19
| In reply to the stress of spawning and what not, should it be that natural bait be allowed earlier in the spring? Doing a research paper for school now on the effects of catch and release and the percentage of fish that die due to mortality from natural bait is almost 35% more than using artificial bait which is less than 2%. I'm not saying or radding on anyone or quite frankly not specifically generalizing at muskies. Just throwing out an idea if we are all worried about stress and mortality, why not look at how we fish and what baits we use? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 243
| Zolson - 5/4/2011 10:09 PM
In reply to the stress of spawning and what not, should it be that natural bait be allowed earlier in the spring? Doing a research paper for school now on the effects of catch and release and the percentage of fish that die due to mortality from natural bait is almost 35% more than using artificial bait which is less than 2%. I'm not saying or radding on anyone or quite frankly not specifically generalizing at muskies. Just throwing out an idea if we are all worried about stress and mortality, why not look at how we fish and what baits we use?
A mortality rate of 35% using quick strike rigs sounds very high. It might be best to define "using live bait" a little more clearly---sounds like single hook rigs must be counted in there to me. I catch a lot of my muskies on quick strikes every year and have never killed one that I know of. If the kill rate is 35%, I should have had many more floaters by now...
Wow, this thread has changed direction! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 880
Location: New Berlin,Wisconsin,53151 | Can't wait either as the boat is getting ready, should be done on time for Saturday morning. The pier didn't get in so I'll be like the rest of you at the launch, lunch will be a little different by the bloody's will taste the same.....
Bruce |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1906
Location: Oconto Falls, WI | Sam Ubl - 5/4/2011 10:44 AM
So how many are straying from the 'in spring, go small' mindset and opting for the 'go big or go home'? If the presence of bigger females making themselves vulnerable proves out, I'm going to plan on upsizing my aresenal assuming these fish will be looking for a bigger, easier meal.. Maybe I'll take that 9" Suick for a walk and break out the Mag Shallow Dawg for its first swim of the season.. I may even Weagle it :-O
To try and get back on track (sorry for making thread go astray to try and invoke some thought) I will go small for the MI opener next weekend since the water temps will be cold. Even after last years warmer spring the fish showed a strong preference to a 6" tube. Although perhaps it was just a pattern on that lake. I don't think you can go wrong with a tube early on regardless of temps. If that don't work I will be going back to my usualy stuff (8-10").
By the way, WTD topwater is NEVER a bad choice for an opener regardless of temps as well.
Edited by CiscoKid 5/5/2011 6:58 AM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 272
| I have learned that a 2-hook husky jerk is the best muskie bait ever made. A friend of mine used to say it was 4" tube jig. Both have their moments. Perhaps somewhat specific to the system I fish and their forage preference at times.
Likely I won't be using either of these baits on either of our openers, but I will be using smallish baits. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 19
| IM Musky Time - 5/5/2011 6:47 AM
Zolson - 5/4/2011 10:09 PM
In reply to the stress of spawning and what not, should it be that natural bait be allowed earlier in the spring? Doing a research paper for school now on the effects of catch and release and the percentage of fish that die due to mortality from natural bait is almost 35% more than using artificial bait which is less than 2%. I'm not saying or radding on anyone or quite frankly not specifically generalizing at muskies. Just throwing out an idea if we are all worried about stress and mortality, why not look at how we fish and what baits we use?
A mortality rate of 35% using quick strike rigs sounds very high. It might be best to define "using live bait" a little more clearly---sounds like single hook rigs must be counted in there to me. I catch a lot of my muskies on quick strikes every year and have never killed one that I know of. If the kill rate is 35%, I should have had many more floaters by now...
Wow, this thread has changed direction!
Just basing information from a article, like I said not directly linked to muskies just a general observation.
Ill be throwing my trusty undertaker gotta keep the streak alive |
|
| |
|
Posts: 218
| If it is a 35% increase in mortality and mortality is 2%, it is not an increase of even 1 fish for every 100 fish caught. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 19
| 60% rain showers East winds 5-10mph highs in the mid 50s....I can roll with that. I plan on launching some casts off our pier at 12:02am. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 999
| So i'd just target the big females that are done spawing allready and are up shallow to speed up there metabolism to put their feedbag on and recoupe. If you see a big female full of eggs hold your cast back and pick one out that is empty. Dont waste your time on those little ratty males that are still up there. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 461
| I'm an equal opportunity hook setter and try to give em all a good eye crossing. Hopefully the Quad County Hawg Hunters have a nice showing again this year, and everyone else has a safe and enjoyable opener.
Edited by chasintails 5/6/2011 3:05 PM
|
|
| |
|
Location: SE Wisconsin | The question now become, "Who will steal the Homepage photo with their opening day hawg?"... We'll see, good luck and stay courtious to your fellow anglers |
|
| |
|
Posts: 19
| Good luck cya on the water...its finally here! |
|
| |
