|
|
Posts: 159
|
Can anyone give me a direct comparison between the ST Croix Premier 8'6 (2-6 oz) and the TI 8'6 rod rated for similar lures.
Also the Premier 8'6 4-10 oz vs the comparable TI rod?
Also the Slingblade 8'6 vs comparable TI rod
And the Big Nasty 9'0 vs comparable TI rod
And the Big Dawg 9'0 vs comparable TI rod
When I tried the Okuma 9'3 XH last summer it felt SO heavy compared to my ST Croixs it was a deal breaker.
Wonder if the TI rods feel that way? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2687
Location: Hayward, WI | http://www.tackleindustries.com/muskypikerods.html
http://www.stcroixrods.com/pdfs/STC_2011_FW_Section.pdf
There 'ya go! 
Tucker |
|
| |
|
Posts: 349
| TI removable handle
9' XH (3-12) - 11.9
9' MH (1-6) - 11.6
TI telescopic (removable handle and split grip)
9' XH (3-12) - 13.1/12.4
9' MH (1-6) - 12.7/10.7
Premier (not sure how the XH is lighter than the H but it's from their website)
8'6" XH (4-10) - 10.7 ?
8'6" H (2-6) - 11.0 ?
LT (traditional handle and split grip)
Slingblade (2-6) - 10.2/9.6
Big Nasty (2-6) - 11.3/10.7
Big Dawg (4-10) - 10.4/9.8 |
|
| |
|
Posts: 159
|
Thanks guys--thats what I was looking for,
The next question that is begging to be asked----How do these rods stack up in a direct comparison by those who have used both rods----I know thats a lot to ask.
But would make for some interesting reading. |
|
| |
TI rod weights vs St Croix rod weights