Tiger or Not?
Big Perc
Posted 6/3/2010 12:06 PM (#443741)
Subject: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 1188


Location: Iowa
This is a fish a buddy of mine caught and we have kind of been wondering whether or not it is a Hybrid or a Pure Strain...we intially thought it was a pure strain but the more I look at it the more I think it is a Hybrid...what do you guys think...it was a he!! of a fish either way...

Big Perc


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(Tiger or Not.JPG)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments Tiger or Not.JPG (24KB - 662 downloads)
Guest
Posted 6/3/2010 12:09 PM (#443742 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: RE: Tiger or Not?


Not.
jonnysled
Posted 6/3/2010 12:10 PM (#443743 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 13688


Location: minocqua, wi.
Not ... just a real pretty one
KenK
Posted 6/3/2010 12:13 PM (#443744 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 576


Location: Elk Grove Village, IL & Phillips, WI
Nope, not a tiger. Tail looks pointed.
Hunter4
Posted 6/3/2010 12:15 PM (#443745 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 720


Beautiful fish and not a tiger.
muskie! nut
Posted 6/3/2010 12:16 PM (#443746 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 2893


Location: Yahara River Chain
not - fins are pointed
IAJustin
Posted 6/3/2010 12:42 PM (#443758 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 2087


100% not - Its a barred muskie like this one:

Edited by IAJustin 6/3/2010 12:50 PM



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(40 3-31-10 (3).jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments 40 3-31-10 (3).jpg (87KB - 185 downloads)
Guest
Posted 6/3/2010 1:06 PM (#443762 - in reply to #443758)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?


IAJustin - 6/3/2010 12:42 PM

100% not - Its a barred muskie like this one:


looks spotted to me. Probably a GB fish?
Musky Madman
Posted 6/3/2010 1:13 PM (#443768 - in reply to #443762)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?



looks spotted to me. Probably a GB fish?

My thoughts exactly. GB.
muskie24/7
Posted 6/3/2010 1:15 PM (#443769 - in reply to #443768)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 909


NOPE, Pretty one though!

Brian
musky-skunk
Posted 6/3/2010 1:17 PM (#443771 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: RE: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 785


That ones markings are darker but if you look at the fish below very similar markings. There's a lake I fish that has a lot of them marked like that... and I have a funny feeling it's the same lake your friend got that one on. Pure strain musky. They actually look a lot like pictures I've seen of Lake Wabigoon fish though I've never been there.

Andy


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(45.jpg)


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(42.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments 45.jpg (88KB - 160 downloads)
Attachments 42.jpg (94KB - 140 downloads)
IAJustin
Posted 6/3/2010 2:02 PM (#443779 - in reply to #443768)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 2087


Musky Madman - 6/3/2010 1:13 PM


looks spotted to me. Probably a GB fish?


My thoughts exactly. GB.



the pic I posted and the fish Big Perc posted are both Iowa fish - same hatchery different lakes.
musky-skunk
Posted 6/3/2010 4:32 PM (#443808 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: RE: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 785


The pics I posted are Iowa as well. Same lake has barred and clear fish in it as well as spots.
esox911
Posted 6/3/2010 9:15 PM (#443853 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: RE: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 556


I would say DEFINATELY NOT A TIGER, and I would agree with others on a nice G.B. Fish---.
DKMKmuskyman
Posted 6/3/2010 11:10 PM (#443878 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 16


Location: north metro
check the pores on the bottom jaw. more then 7 then its a for sure musky, 5 to 7 it may be a tiger then the next way to tell is if the the points of the tail are rounded or not. i agree with everyone else for sure a just a really pretty muskie
Big Perc
Posted 6/4/2010 7:42 AM (#443891 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: RE: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 1188


Location: Iowa
Thanks for all your input guys, when I look at this fish compared to the leopard tiger below I caught 8 years ago I see that this is not a tiger, and just a really pretty colored pure strain.

Thanks again,
Big Perc


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(41.5 inch Hybrid.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments 41.5 inch Hybrid.jpg (38KB - 162 downloads)
whynot
Posted 6/4/2010 8:03 AM (#443897 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: RE: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 899


I'd give that fish a 6...nice body, ugly face.
muskie! nut
Posted 6/4/2010 8:04 AM (#443898 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 2893


Location: Yahara River Chain
Leopard Tiger??? Really??
jonnysled
Posted 6/4/2010 8:15 AM (#443900 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 13688


Location: minocqua, wi.
that ain't a leapard either ...
Mr Musky
Posted 6/4/2010 10:57 PM (#444027 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 999


The original is most definitelty a GB spottie or a leech laker spottie, big perch your last pic is definitely a tiger.

Edited by Mr Musky 6/4/2010 10:59 PM
tom long
Posted 6/5/2010 12:04 AM (#444031 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: RE: Tiger or Not?


tiger
mnmusky101
Posted 6/6/2010 9:59 PM (#444224 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 169


Location: Houlton, WI
Not a tiger
ILGreenhead
Posted 6/6/2010 10:26 PM (#444230 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 122


Location: North Central Illinois
1st fish definitely a pure Leech Laker and 2nd fish definitely a tiger but NOT a leopard.....
IAJustin
Posted 6/6/2010 11:23 PM (#444241 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 2087


i wish Iowa got Leech lake strain!
BenR
Posted 6/6/2010 11:26 PM (#444242 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?


Actually it might be a Miger, not a tiger though...a strain of hybrids where the muskie is the dominant gene. A new strain that is just starting to be looked at. That might actually be the first Miger ever photographed...congrats!
muskie! nut
Posted 6/7/2010 9:35 AM (#444281 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 2893


Location: Yahara River Chain
Miger???????

We need more muskies - way too much time in between strikes. Gives a guy too much time to think.
Big Perc
Posted 6/7/2010 2:04 PM (#444336 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 1188


Location: Iowa
That tiger in the second picture came from eagle lake ontario, the only place where leopard tigers exist as far as I have been told...and yes I have been told by many very reputable muskie fisherman in the industry that the fish was indeed a leopard tiger!
ToothyCritter
Posted 6/7/2010 2:08 PM (#444337 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 667


Location: Roscoe IL
It's a Liger...
Anonymous
Posted 6/7/2010 2:17 PM (#444340 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: RE: Tiger or Not?


Nice Tiger but leapord tiger? Really?

Where's Sorno to clarify? He's the law when it comes to tigers.

Edited by Anonymous 6/7/2010 2:18 PM
BNelson
Posted 6/7/2010 2:27 PM (#444342 - in reply to #444340)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Location: Contrarian Island
found this one posted on the net as a leopard...i have seen pics of some other so called leopards I think out of Herbies camp but they didn't look like this one...


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(leopard-muskie.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments leopard-muskie.jpg (128KB - 415 downloads)
john skarie
Posted 6/7/2010 2:32 PM (#444344 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?




Posts: 221


Location: Detroint Lakes, MN

I dont' think the "leopards" are hybrids, but have a unique pattern to them.

They say they only exist on Eagle.

But fishermen say a lot of things.

JS
muskie! nut
Posted 6/7/2010 2:46 PM (#444347 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 2893


Location: Yahara River Chain
The problem I have with the term "leopard tiger" is that one term suggest spots and the other suggest stripes. The reason that hybrids get the term "tiger" attached to them is because of the vivid strips they have. When they don't have those stripes, can you still call them a "tiger"?
Musky Brian
Posted 6/7/2010 2:55 PM (#444349 - in reply to #444347)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 1767


Location: Lake Country, Wisconsin
The "Eagle Lake only" theory is not accurate, the guide in the photo Brad posted, Dean, does not fish anywhere near Eagle and is based out of the Nestor Falls area.

Edited by Musky Brian 6/7/2010 2:57 PM
musky-skunk
Posted 6/7/2010 4:54 PM (#444369 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: RE: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 785


Beautiful big tiger big perc but it looks like every other tiger that's been put in my boat. 9 from minnesota and two from Canada so far. Pretty sure it's just a nice regular tiger musky. That "leopard" one what every it is looks AWESOME! I'd love to get a replica made of a 50+ of one of them!
muskie! nut
Posted 6/7/2010 5:50 PM (#444375 - in reply to #444349)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 2893


Location: Yahara River Chain
Musky Brian - 6/7/2010 2:55 PM

The "Eagle Lake only" theory is not accurate, the guide in the photo Brad posted, Dean, does not fish anywhere near Eagle and is based out of the Nestor Falls area.


You guys need to read closer what's being typed. In the pic that Brad posted it clearly stated that is is a true muskie not a HYBRID as Big Perc has shown (like the previous poster noted looks just like most other hybrids I've seen) as a "leopard tiger" hybrid that some are claiming only occurs in Eagle Lake.
PSYS
Posted 6/7/2010 6:50 PM (#444385 - in reply to #444337)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 1030


Location: APPLETON, WI

ToothyCritter - 6/7/2010 2:08 PM It's a Liger... :)

 

LOL!!!

muskie! nut
Posted 6/7/2010 10:09 PM (#444401 - in reply to #444385)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 2893


Location: Yahara River Chain
I was doing some digging. Check this out.


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(leopardtiger.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments leopardtiger.jpg (18KB - 181 downloads)
Kuhly
Posted 6/8/2010 9:40 AM (#444442 - in reply to #443741)
Subject: Re: Tiger or Not?





Posts: 96


Location: Eau Claire
Thats a sweet looking fish! Good luck seeing that one laying in the weeds! Maybe natural selection is favoring more camouflage now.

Edited by Kuhly 6/8/2010 9:47 AM