Huge Tiger!!
RiverMan
Posted 8/12/2009 9:25 PM (#393907)
Subject: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 1504


Location: Oregon
I thought you guys might like to see this huge Tiger Musky caught in the state of Washington. I don't know anything about this guy or the fish other than it was reported to be 50.5 inches long and released. What a fish!

Jed V.


Edited by RiverMan 8/12/2009 9:27 PM



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(curlewtiger.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments curlewtiger.jpg (104KB - 101 downloads)
Muskerboy
Posted 8/12/2009 9:30 PM (#393908 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 727


Nice fish!

Edited by Muskerboy 8/12/2009 9:31 PM
floydss
Posted 8/12/2009 9:31 PM (#393909 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 282


Location: north west wisconsin
that things a monster!!
Esox-Hunter
Posted 8/12/2009 9:46 PM (#393911 - in reply to #393909)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 774


Location: South East Wisconsin
BIG TIGER! S. Killips
curleytail
Posted 8/12/2009 9:51 PM (#393912 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 2686


Location: Hayward, WI
WWWOOOOOWWWWW! Can't hide big.

curleytail
sorenson
Posted 8/12/2009 9:55 PM (#393913 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 1764


Location: Ogden, Ut
Yep, I do believe that fish qualifies as huge. Congrats to the angler.
S.
JRedig
Posted 8/12/2009 10:16 PM (#393918 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Location: Twin Cities
Way big, nice!
brewcrew
Posted 8/12/2009 10:35 PM (#393922 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 283


Look at the head on that thing!
bfunk73183
Posted 8/12/2009 10:43 PM (#393925 - in reply to #393922)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 315


drrrroooooooolll


-b.a-
Slim
Posted 8/12/2009 11:14 PM (#393929 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 59


Big fish, doesnt look to lively though :/
RiverMan
Posted 8/12/2009 11:54 PM (#393936 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 1504


Location: Oregon
I agree with you Slim........................it was supposedly released but it looks really dry like it has been out of the water for awhile.

Jed
jay lip ripper
Posted 8/13/2009 12:16 AM (#393938 - in reply to #393936)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 392


Location: lake x...where the hell is it?
i agree with ya to slim, it looks like there is dryed blood on it and no slime. but if he did keep it, so be it, a 50" tiger IS a fish of a lifetime and with the way they are growing them out west there be plenty more to come. the fisheries are really doing very well out west from everything i have seen. it almost makes me want to move. hope to hear more about this pig.
Hunter4
Posted 8/13/2009 1:26 AM (#393941 - in reply to #393938)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 720


Holy Crap thats huge.
dtaijo174
Posted 8/13/2009 7:31 AM (#393953 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 1169


Location: New Hope MN
my god.
Tim Schmitz
Posted 8/13/2009 8:37 AM (#393967 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 540


Location: MN
I would trade all my DCG'S to catch a tiger like that.
Shoot2Kill
Posted 8/13/2009 8:38 AM (#393968 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 158


GOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
AFchris
Posted 8/13/2009 9:04 AM (#393971 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 265


Location: McGuire AFB, NJ
I would trade all tim's dcg's for a tiger like that too! what fatty hatty!
RiverMan
Posted 8/13/2009 9:17 AM (#393975 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 1504


Location: Oregon
The state of Washington has something like 10 lakes with Tiger Musky in them. The tigers were first introduced to control rough fish but have since become popular with sport fisherman. The number of fish in our lakes is a fraction of what midwest lakes have and for this reason anglers felt it was important to protect them. In 2009, the state adopted a minimum length of "more than 50 inches". This fish was just over the minimum length size. I expect we will be seeing some very old and very large fish in the coming years. The lake this fish came out of is said to already have a good number of fish in this size range.

Jed



Edited by RiverMan 8/13/2009 3:00 PM
Guest
Posted 8/13/2009 12:55 PM (#394003 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: RE: Huge Tiger!!


Eyes look dead and he's on a dock.
JRedig
Posted 8/13/2009 1:02 PM (#394007 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Location: Twin Cities
I would think that a tiger of this size has to throw the 7 year life cycle theory out the window...yes/no?

Edited by JRedig 8/13/2009 1:03 PM
THA4
Posted 8/13/2009 1:39 PM (#394008 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 468


Location: Not where I wanna be!
giant fish.... I want one!
dtaijo174
Posted 8/13/2009 1:47 PM (#394009 - in reply to #394007)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 1169


Location: New Hope MN
JRedig - 8/13/2009 1:02 PM

I would think that a tiger of this size has to throw the 7 year life cycle theory out the window...yes/no?


I've always thought that too.
FishBigMama50
Posted 8/13/2009 2:06 PM (#394011 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: RE: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 23


What a slobasauras massive rex wow!!!!!!
Tim Schmitz
Posted 8/13/2009 3:28 PM (#394021 - in reply to #393971)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 540


Location: MN
AFchris - 8/13/2009 9:04 AM

I would trade all tim's dcg's for a tiger like that too! what fatty hatty!

Dude you can have them if I can catch a 50" tiger
esox911
Posted 8/13/2009 5:06 PM (#394032 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: RE: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 556


Yes, fish looks dead to me BUT I would have to say who can blame a guy with a 50+ inch tiger. What a fish !!
BenR
Posted 8/13/2009 6:02 PM (#394037 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!


A pre-mature baby was recently pronounced dead by actual doctors, only to end up having been alive...imagine how often they would be wrong if they just looked at pictures of people to diagnose...Nice Fish!
Guest
Posted 8/13/2009 6:24 PM (#394039 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: RE: Huge Tiger!!


these fish are so weak, outside the water, plus hanging it up like that with gravity its dead
BenR
Posted 8/13/2009 6:28 PM (#394040 - in reply to #394039)
Subject: RE: Huge Tiger!!


Guest - 8/13/2009 6:24 PM

these fish are so weak, outside the water, plus hanging it up like that with gravity its dead


So they are strong enough to use 9 foot rods, saltwater reels, 100lb test to jam the hooks of a DC into their mouths...or perhaps you are right and fishing for them is a serious problem...
Anonymous
Posted 8/13/2009 8:09 PM (#394050 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!


Dandy

Edited by Anonymous 8/13/2009 11:44 PM
Reef Hawg
Posted 8/13/2009 8:21 PM (#394052 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: RE: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 3518


Location: north central wisconsin
What a fish. And to think I just returned from Oregon on fam visit frogging for salmon/steelies and didn't get the chance to drive up there to at least check some of that out. Will try to look one of you Wash state cats up on next visit for sure!! Anyone have a float plane that can pick me up in Newport Or. when we're there? I'd gladly trade a WI/MN/G-Bay trip for a shot at one of those bad boys! Beautiful country there for sure though. That was one perfect speciman of a hybrid to release or harvest if one chooses.
mn_bowhunter
Posted 8/13/2009 8:38 PM (#394058 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 51


It's widely known that tigers are NOT sterile. Males are 99.9% of the time. Females are not. Female tigers can spawn with muskies or pike.
Fish and Whistle
Posted 8/13/2009 9:12 PM (#394067 - in reply to #394040)
Subject: RE: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 462


Location: Antioch, IL
BenR - 8/13/2009 6:28 PM

Guest - 8/13/2009 6:24 PM

these fish are so weak, outside the water, plus hanging it up like that with gravity its dead


So they are strong enough to use 9 foot rods, saltwater reels, 100lb test to jam the hooks of a DC into their mouths...or perhaps you are right and fishing for them is a serious problem...


Hey Ben,

I believe guest was referring to how the fishes body is not designed to support itself out of water. They spend all there life with their weight supported by the water around them. Fishes spines are not like ours they need support, especially big fish such as this one. It is important to practice and educate others of two handed horizontal holds. Congrats to this gentleman on a beauty of a fish!
Mr Musky
Posted 8/13/2009 9:39 PM (#394071 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!





Posts: 999


And why dont they stock Tigers in Wisconsin anymore? Congrats on an awesome fish!!!
BALDY
Posted 8/14/2009 8:01 AM (#394102 - in reply to #394007)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 2378


JRedig - 8/13/2009 1:02 PM

I would think that a tiger of this size has to throw the 7 year life cycle theory out the window...yes/no?


Not necessarily.

I know from talking to Sorno that the Tigers in these Western Reservoirs have crazy growth potential.

Kent may have to correct me, but I seem to remember something about a 45" average in roughly 5 years. No doubt one of these fish can get to 50 in 7-8 years.
JKahler
Posted 8/14/2009 8:26 AM (#394105 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!




Posts: 1308


Location: WI
I've read that they can hit 30" in two years.
BenR
Posted 8/14/2009 10:03 PM (#394196 - in reply to #394102)
Subject: Re: Huge Tiger!!


BALDY - 8/14/2009 8:01 AM

JRedig - 8/13/2009 1:02 PM

I would think that a tiger of this size has to throw the 7 year life cycle theory out the window...yes/no?


Not necessarily.

I know from talking to Sorno that the Tigers in these Western Reservoirs have crazy growth potential.

Kent may have to correct me, but I seem to remember something about a 45" average in roughly 5 years. No doubt one of these fish can get to 50 in 7-8 years.


I agree, CO has a poor fishery now, but I took a quick trip down to NM and was amazed at how quick their fish have grown...fun stuff for sure.
FYGR8
Posted 8/15/2009 7:40 AM (#394253 - in reply to #393907)
Subject: RE: Huge Tiger!!





There was just a 53" giant hybrid caught by a walleye angler on a crawler harness. Photos of the successfully released fish were in the local paper. Looks like I need to sharpen the hooks on my "crawler harness" pattern cowgirl.