Posted 9/17/2007 10:40 AM (#275288 - in reply to #275270) Subject: Re: I thought muskie teeth were big...
Posts: 16632
Location: The desert
Forget the paddle....Grab the Glock
OLD GOAT
Posted 9/17/2007 11:00 AM (#275293 - in reply to #275270) Subject: RE: I thought muskie teeth were big...
RE: L. Dahlberg has caught HUGE fish where ever he has been..... And he doesn't pound his chest either!!! An angler we all could learn volumes of info from........Don't break the toy!!!!
Posted 9/17/2007 2:13 PM (#275321 - in reply to #275293) Subject: RE: I thought muskie teeth were big...
Posts: 2024
OLD GOAT - 9/17/2007 11:00 AM
RE: L. Dahlberg has caught HUGE fish where ever he has been..... And he doesn't pound his chest either!!! An angler we all could learn volumes of info from........Don't break the toy!!!!
If I could fish with one person in the entire world... hands down Larry Dahlberg at his destination of choice.
Posted 9/17/2007 2:50 PM (#275326 - in reply to #275270) Subject: RE: I thought muskie teeth were big...
Posts: 2754
Location: Mauston, Wisconsin
The difference is in the design of the teeth-> for sure you wouldn't want that beasty clamping down on your hand. Obviously given the top photo and where he has his fingers between the teeth, they look more conical like those of a walleye. Pike/Muskie canine teeth are serrated (like a great white shark's), this makes them very nasty cutting instruments. Something most ESOX fisherman learn very early on in their encounters with feisty ole' ESOX....