|
|
Posts: 113
| The guy in this photo is 6'2 260, he didnt measure the fish due to the eggs she was releasing. How big is it? If other, put what you think the size is. Thanks
Edited by Will Dykstra 6/28/2007 6:18 PM
Attachments
----------------
 Jakes Musky.jpg (56KB - 98 downloads)
jakesmusky.jpg (62KB - 97 downloads)
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 113
| Is other smaller than 50? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2893
Location: Yahara River Chain | Will is that a hybrid???? I bet Dabunchman would say so.  |
|
| |
|
Posts: 484
Location: St. Louis, MO., Marco Is., FL, Nestor Falls, ON | 53" X 25" or 40 lbs. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 3242
Location: Racine, Wi | 2,546"x122 Easy 1000#er.
Nice fish. |
|
| |
|
| Definatly a hybrid! LOL  Nice to hear, I wish i could have been there for this fish..... Awesome fish. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 4080
Location: Elko - Lake Vermilion | Nice fish, Maybe 49-51
use gloves if your scared to get some slime on you, or cut ....
Jerome |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1530
| beautyfull fish. everyfish is a trophy. why start a debate. thats my theory on seeing pics of muskies caught, unless i witness measuring. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 52
| I say 52.73". What a beauty!
Edited by Even the Losers 6/29/2007 1:43 PM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 1245
Location: Madtown, WI | Ditch the visor???? WHat...and No spike hair didn't go out in the 80's...ask B.Nelson...he was sporting the visor/spike hair look last year....so it still must be in style.....
Nice fish..hard to guess from those photos...but I would just say its a 50 inch class fish.....
Cory |
|
| |
|
| visors rock ...you'll go bald wearin' a hat...have fun w/ that!
my hair is only spiked after traveling at a high rate of speed in Ranger boats...
didn't know it was a fashion show out there...lol
I'd say 50-51, but a fatty for sure... |
|
| |
|
Posts: 785
| tuffy1 - 6/28/2007 7:39 PM
2,546"x122 Easy 1000#er.
Nice fish.
Man, I just busted a gut reading that, nice fish, I went with 53"es but it is hard to say, could just as easily be a fat 51-52"er.... or a 2,546"x122" 1000 lb fish HAHA. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1188
Location: Iowa | Fat fish for sure but I would say 51-52...
Big Perc |
|
| |
|
Location: The Yahara Chain | C.Painter - 6/29/2007 7:06 AM
Ditch the visor???? WHat...and No spike hair didn't go out in the 80's...ask B.Nelson...he was sporting the visor/spike hair look last year....so it still must be in style.....
Spiked hair is not out of fashion and neither are mullets, they rock. Chicks dig both of those hairstyles. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2361
| I guess I am confused, he didn't want to measure it because of the eggs it was carrying, and yet he held it up like this?
Was this fish in season or preseason? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 723
| that makes sense, easilly measured in the water, only takes a second or two during the release.
Very nice fish for sure, funny how two different poses with a fish make it look 2 different sizes.
using the Average of 4" for hand width, Id say that fish goes right around 53.
just how I judge fish in pics. |
|
| |
|
| Nice fish, easily 51 to 53 |
|
| |
|
Posts: 3518
Location: north central wisconsin | nice beast!! Just looking at some similarily sized fish recently caught by a similarily sized dude, and I'd put it in the 51-53" range.
Edited by Reef Hawg 6/29/2007 4:02 PM
|
|
| |
|
| The gentleman who caught this fish caught it yesterday, June 28 on a Canadian lake. He didn't want to harm the fish and once he realized it was releasing eggs he immedialty got it back into the water. He was by himself , no net man, no camera man and set his camera on the front seat. I give him credit. |
|
| |
