|
|
Posts: 1185
Location: Wishin I Was Fishin' | How many have not registered fish in the 45"-48" range because they don't want a replica of a fish in this size?
Just wondering because the stats don't show many smaller fish. Or is that most are catching 48"+ fish?
I registered all of mine that made the cut because even a 45" Lax replica would be cool to hang at the office or cottage. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1764
Location: Ogden, Ut | I haven't because, well, uh, I haven't caught a 45" fish...44.5 and climbing 
S.
I still have a month and a half of open water though! |
|
| |
|
Posts: 199
Location: Nebraska | Also the earlier thread indicated that you don't have to get a replica of that fish. Each fish justs gets you another "ticket in the barrel". Another one here with the largest at 44". No replica this year.
IIRC,
Stein
Edited by Stein 11/2/2006 8:30 AM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 32886
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | There are some really nice fish pictured on MuskieFIRST that are NOT entered, which I don't understand...right now it's about 1 in 200 to win, not bad odds. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1185
Location: Iowa | I keep trying to enter a 45 x 20 I caught in september and it won't let me...can anyone help me...
Big Perc |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2691
Location: Pewaukee, Wisconsin | I just got a very fat 44 and some change yesterday. Just about 1/2-inch short. Thats the 4th one that close lately. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 136
| Must be a JPEG |
|
| |
|
Posts: 723
| patience jo, patience, some guys are too busy fishing to sit in front of a computer! |
|
| |
Lax Replica contest?