|
|
Posts: 2068
Location: Appleton,WI | Found this picture surfin the internet.Is this fish really 60"as claimed or is it the camera angle?
Attachments
----------------
 60_2.jpg (6KB - 93 downloads)
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 502
Location: Lincoln UK | camera angle surely.
Edited by chico 7/9/2006 5:30 PM
|
|
| |
|
| They get quite a few legit 60's out east each year...so I would not be surprised...I am just more surprised that somebody actually let a photo of it get on the net...Ben |
|
| |
|
Location: Northern Wisconsin | isnt that ne of the lindners? |
|
| |
|
Posts: 1168
| That pic has cycled through from time to time. Definately camera angle. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2378
| yep, thats Jim. And yep, nice camera angle |
|
| |
|
Posts: 4266
| If James Lindner caught a 60"er, you would hear about it.
I would say creative photograhy by Dan Sura.
I believe that he even caught that during a TV segment.
Beav |
|
| |
|
Posts: 367
Location: Chicago | Yes I remember that episode. Not anywhere close to 60". Great shot though. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 129
| that fish was a 53.5 incher if i remember right. they thought it was close to the state record. that pic is a few years old. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 281
Location: Girdwood, Alaska | Definitely a nice fish, but nowhere near 60". Just a good camera angle |
|
| |
|
| Jim Linder, great shot of a nice 50 plus musky but not close to 60!
He has taught me much about fishing rivers for muskies, so I surely thank him and love the Angling Edge show and DVD  |
|
| |
|
Posts: 221
Location: ohio | if it is a 60, I wanna know when,where and on what. As does everyone else |
|
| |
|
Posts: 136
| Looks like a WI guide hold to me. If it was 60 inches he couldn't hold it so far from his body. |
|
| |
