|
|
| Let's see how many have caught one.
Anon so noone has to give up lake and area.
Perhaps we will find some just need to "Fish Better" instead of changing what actually does work.
|
|
|
|

Posts: 1769
Location: Algonquin, ILL | Had a few beasts on but none in the net
|
|
|
|

Posts: 691
Location: nationwide | Three in the 49 to 49-3/4 inch range but nothing I could feel good calling 50 . . . . . but this is the year right???????
Corey Meyer |
|
|
|

Posts: 667
Location: Roscoe IL | 50 x 27.5 last year out of the Wisconsin River.
I caught it on a sucker(QS Rig)
CPR! |
|
|
|

Posts: 32935
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | Yup.
54 is the biggest. Seven personal, twelve total I think, have to look that over again. |
|
|
|
| Seen a couple but none caught. Actually, biggest one I have seen so far tried to eat my brothers 16" walleye while he was reeling it in....Still looking for her |
|
|
|

Posts: 4266
| Not yet, but I've had several chances.
I wish 50"ers would hit lures like 20" northerns, then they'd have 3 hooks in them every time.
Beav |
|
|
|
Posts: 2037
Location: lansing, il | i voted no but i did net my partners wisconsin 51 about 10 years ago |
|
|
|

Posts: 2691
Location: Pewaukee, Wisconsin | Yes, a 53 and 52 1/2 last year. Both released.
2 other fish came close. Mark Sankeys 49 1/2 and my 49 1/2. Both fish were caught in the same area and 7 days apart. Different fish for sure. |
|
|