Hard Mono vs. Flourocarbon
nwild
Posted 10/3/2003 1:49 PM (#83810)
Subject: Hard Mono vs. Flourocarbon





Posts: 1996


Location: Pelican Lake/Three Lakes Chain
Looking at using this material for some sucker rigs. What is the difference between the two types of lines. Is it just visibility issues or is the flouro harder?
Trophymuskie
Posted 10/3/2003 7:23 PM (#83843 - in reply to #83810)
Subject: RE: Hard Mono vs. Flourocarbon





Posts: 1430


Location: Eastern Ontario
Fluro is harder but it cost 6 times more ( 80# ). I use hard mono and change them as soon as I see a nick and save $$. I make 4' hard mono leaders with size 6 crosslock snaps and swivels and I can hold it in the middle and the snap and swivel will be over 12 inches away so it's pretty hard stuff.
ToddM
Posted 10/3/2003 8:07 PM (#83845 - in reply to #83810)
Subject: RE: Hard Mono vs. Flourocarbon





Posts: 20278


Location: oswego, il
Norm, I make my own flourocarbon sucker rigs. They work great. I do not make up a whole rig, i have several lead lengths made up to assemble a rig to fit the sucker. I usually use two hooks, 1/0 or 2/0. I put one in front of the top dorsal and one underneath in front of the rear underside fins. I find especially with smaller suckers under 16" you have to have the hook on the bottom or they won't ride upright. I put the two leads on the snap of my 3ft trolling leader, which is flouorcarbon too and attach that to the sucker as a rubber band rig in the nose. I use crimps for my leads but knots will do fine, just add a drop of superglue to it for insurance.