Posted 2/28/2017 8:35 AM (#851445) Subject: Ranger R93
Posts: 983
What are you guys thoughts on the Ranger R93 Im looking at a 1998 R93 with mercury 200EFI....boats seems to be well taken care of looks great...any one know what length rods this boat will hold? any info reviews on this boat...
Posted 2/28/2017 4:14 PM (#851528 - in reply to #851445) Subject: Re: Ranger R93
I currently own a 1998 R73 with a 150. Its ok. If I could go back and do it again I would not buy a bass hull. Rod locker on the 73 is 6'6" I believe. I would have to guess the R93 would be a bit bigger but not much.
Posted 3/1/2017 8:32 AM (#851615 - in reply to #851445) Subject: Re: Ranger R93
Posts: 983
looking like you can get 7'9" as it is and if you modify slightly should be able to get 8ft in there so Ill fit most rods other than like 2 which are the 2 most used so I think Ill be ok here thanks guys
Posted 3/2/2017 10:22 AM (#851791 - in reply to #851764) Subject: Re: Ranger R93
Posts: 983
Musky Brian - 3/2/2017 8:09 AM
Had an R73 years ago. Wasn't ideal, but I made it work. Good starter Ranger..
R73 would have been to small for me too....I just upgraded from a 87 bayliner trophy bass boat so Huge upgrade for me and will do anything I need it to do and it has the ability to hold a kicker motor so I should be set...big wide stable platfrom the from and rear decks are huge compared to my old boat...you could have 3 guys on bow of this boat I cant believe the deck sizes seems like its perfect for what I do...Plus I fish Musky the most but do go walleye bass and crappie fish as well when I dont have time to travel to Musky waters...Can go fish bass crappie water that is 10 min from home got to go hour min to get to decent musky water
Ranger R93