Comparing Specs
Tahoe
Posted 7/3/2003 8:30 PM (#74965)
Subject: Comparing Specs





Posts: 328


Location: MN		I am comparing specs aginst Crestliner and a Tracker Tundra.
Tundra: Depth Inside = 27"
Transom Height Height = 25/5"
1850 Fish Hawk: Max Depth = 35"
Max Cockpit Depth = 24"

Is the Trnson Height com pared to the cockpit depth?
dpratt
Posted 7/4/2003 8:40 AM (#74987 - in reply to #74965)
Subject: RE: Comparing Specs





Location: Woodstock, IL		The transom height and cockpit depth are two different measurements. The transom measurement is the height of the actual transom (back of the boat where the outboard is mounted). The cockpit depth is from the floor to the gunwhale, I believe.

Be sure to spend some time in both models. I was looking at both until I spent time in the Tundra. I didn't care for the obtrusive way that the port and starboard storage compartments invaded the interior. In addition, the consoles seemed too high to me. I opted for the Fishhawk.

Good luck and have fun shopping!
Tyler Campbell
Posted 7/25/2003 12:20 AM (#76775 - in reply to #74965)
Subject: RE: Comparing Specs





Posts: 172


Location: Chagrin Falls, Ohio

I have to say I'd stay away from the Tracker due to concerns about the quality control. Crestliner builds quality boats. It's a great idea (new hull design), but I've seen way to many problems on the bass boards with Nitros. I think in the long run that Tracker is solely concerned about the bottome line on anything they do. Of course I could be wrong, just my .02.

Good fishin',

Tyler Campbell



Edited by Tyler Campbell 8/3/2003 10:39 PM