Shimano Compre 8' 6" H
Smell_Esox
Posted 4/4/2016 2:01 PM (#812482)
Subject: Shimano Compre 8' 6" H




Posts: 267


Anyone have this rod and what are your comments regarding it's ability to throw a variety of bucktails? I have a 8' XH and it is too stiff IMO to throw smaller to even medium size bucktails.
Landry
Posted 4/4/2016 4:29 PM (#812494 - in reply to #812482)
Subject: Re: Shimano Compre 8' 6" H




Posts: 1023


I would go 9' or 9'6" or longer.
Smell_Esox
Posted 4/6/2016 11:33 AM (#812789 - in reply to #812482)
Subject: RE: Shimano Compre 8' 6" H




Posts: 267


Why? Would the longer rod throw smaller baits better?
Cloud7
Posted 4/6/2016 11:43 AM (#812792 - in reply to #812482)
Subject: Re: Shimano Compre 8' 6" H





Posts: 230


Location: St Paul, Minnesota
I agree with Landry. The longer rod will throw pretty much all baits better. I don't want to say "all" incase someone has an exception that I can't think of, but it will throw small and larger baits better as long as you don't overpower or underpower the rod. I've used the 9'6 XH (which feels like a St. Croix Heavy) and it was a decent rod for tossing pretty much everything topping out at Mag size Bulldawgs. By letting the rod load with the extra length you'll feel the better casting distance and control because you won't be trying to force the cast. Plus they shrink and can store easy. Don't be weirded out by the telescoping rods, they're in like their third generation of them and they're actually pretty solid.

C7
Landry
Posted 4/6/2016 4:06 PM (#812858 - in reply to #812482)
Subject: Re: Shimano Compre 8' 6" H




Posts: 1023


Figure eights are so much easier with 9' or more IMO.
Slobasaurus
Posted 4/6/2016 7:59 PM (#812909 - in reply to #812482)
Subject: Re: Shimano Compre 8' 6" H





Posts: 162


Location: Chicago, IL
I have four or five compres. The 8'6" H is my small bucktail rod and I love it. I threw it some earlier this spring with a rattle trap and it was a little too heavy for that application, but it's great for small blades. I've caught some nice fish in the eight with it. The 8' XH is great for jigging Bondy Baits. The 9'6" is great for double tens.
Mitch Garcia
Posted 4/6/2016 10:00 PM (#812950 - in reply to #812482)
Subject: Re: Shimano Compre 8' 6" H




Posts: 33


Location: Madison, WI
The Compre was my first 9' rod and I thought it was great. Casting, figure 8's, retrieving... The longer rods give me a lot more control all around. I've never gone back to anything shorter. The Compre's not my main rod anymore but it's always in the boat with me with a lure on it and ready to sub in anytime I need it.
Smell_Esox
Posted 4/7/2016 9:09 PM (#813187 - in reply to #812909)
Subject: Re: Shimano Compre 8' 6" H




Posts: 267


Slobasaurus - 4/6/2016 7:59 PM

I have four or five compres. The 8'6" H is my small bucktail rod and I love it. I threw it some earlier this spring with a rattle trap and it was a little too heavy for that application, but it's great for small blades. I've caught some nice fish in the eight with it. The 8' XH is great for jigging Bondy Baits. The 9'6" is great for double tens.
When you say small bucktail, what do you mean by small?
Slobasaurus
Posted 4/11/2016 7:44 PM (#813727 - in reply to #812482)
Subject: Re: Shimano Compre 8' 6" H





Posts: 162


Location: Chicago, IL
Anything less than a double ten.
Smell_Esox
Posted 4/11/2016 8:35 PM (#813735 - in reply to #813727)
Subject: Re: Shimano Compre 8' 6" H




Posts: 267


Slobasaurus - 4/11/2016 7:44 PM

Anything less than a double ten.
OK, cool, thanks!