Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Random quote: "Never, EVER, take a knee in the Pursuit that is your life! You only get one shot at anything, and Fair Catches are for those who choose not to Stand and Deliver, So do not pi$$ it all away! GO HARD, or stay home!"
- (Added by: muskynightmare)

Moderators: sworrall, Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]

 
Message Subject: A civil discussion....Please!
Junkman
Posted 10/29/2014 12:04 PM (#737551)
Subject: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 1220
OK, I know tournament threads get nasty quick, they get taken down or “frozen,” and usually with good reason. An honest discussion without personal attacks, however, might get left alone and actually bear some fruit. The hoped for subject is: How do we reverse the trend of fewer cash tournaments? At, least in Wisconsin, with the end of the WMT-Pro-Mac last year and this week’s final Ironman event, there are actually ten events that I used to fish each year that are no longer available to me. Please refrain from why you think they are gone or why you think any tournament being gone is a great thing. Personally, I don’t care why or who is to blame…I just want those tournament weekends back in my summer. Everybody knows (me too) that I don’t exactly tear these things up with winning a whole lot, but it’s what I love to do with my summer. So, my request (and hope) is that others who enjoy this stuff will post what they would like to see. Somebody might just be thinking about putting on an event and they might like to hear it. I’ll toss out the first pitch: 1. A minimum of 75% of the entries should go back to the anglers or a charity or a fishery; find sponsors to cover anything else you want to earn.
PeonPETA
Posted 10/29/2014 12:25 PM (#737555 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 142
Location: Appleton, WI
Marty I do hope this lasts, I'll chime in. One thing that I really think matters is the "open book policy" when it comes to tournaments, at least the smaller ones. The three charlies and the muskies inc tournament a few weeks before on Pewaukee both did a good job with this. Where does the entry fee go and what is the exact payout structure? Guys don't want to feel robbed, and although when fishing those smaller events the payouts aren't appealing its still a tournament. These events made it clear that $ would go to stocking or back to the club for future use, we can't have tournaments for fish that aren't there! . This is what killed the WMT/Pro Mac in my opinion, when the $ got big the published information went away. Guys felt like the entry fees were going back to line the pockets of a select few individuals and therefore quit the trail. These tournaments don't have a chance to continue without guys that want to fish. Whether you fish the PMTT against 80 teams or a local event with 14 boats winning is still winning and to win you must beat everybody. The costs of running a venture like the PMTT are much higher and their entry fees are set to create attractive payouts and keep the trail operating. Over the past 4 or 5 seasons the PMTT has seen little change in entries, Cave and Eagle River have been around the same number each year. This is better than a decline like other trails have seen, and I believe that with the options limited for the 2015 season the PMTT at Eagle River will see a big jump in numbers. While the PMTT doesn't run open-books or payback 90% or anything like that they do a good job of making participants feel like their entries are handled. Before I sign up for a PMTT event I have a good approximation for how much of my 600 I have a chance to win back, and I'm fine with that %. The feeling of not knowing where the money is will keep anglers away.

Edited by PeonPETA 10/29/2014 12:29 PM
Lumpy
Posted 10/29/2014 12:46 PM (#737564 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: RE: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 102
I felt the Pro-MAC/WMT just had too many events. 6 2-day events, 14 1-day events, and 1 2-day Championship for those that qualify. While I understand it's nice to have many date options so more people can attend overall, I think it lowers the per event attendance. I'd rather see less tournaments with more entrants per tournament than more tournaments with less entrants per tournament. I think 6-8 2-day events for a qualification to a 2-day championship would be great. It'd make each tournament more meaningful towards qualifying for the championship, and higher payouts per event, which I think would get more people into more events.

For non-series tournaments, I think allowing day-of registration is a double edged sword, and I'm not sure if it helps or hurts in the long run. Still stuck on that one.
sworrall
Posted 10/29/2014 7:48 PM (#737608 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 32761
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
No comment. I tried 4 times and deleted several paragraphs 4 times. The KWM is a hoot, fish that one, Marty.
vegas492
Posted 10/30/2014 8:25 AM (#737658 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 1023
Milwaukee Muskies Inc put together a nice little fall tournament. We had a few keys that we stuck to...
The first and foremost was transparency in the tournament. You have to know where your entry fees are going.

Another key was this...if you are helping to run the tournament, do not fish the tournament. It just looks bad.

Structured payout. We had a formula and it was easy to follow. With fewer boats, we eliminated two tiers so that the top 2 teams could get more of a payout. But that was determined by the anglers in the tournament.

Keep the entry fees reasonable. We gave a nice price break to Muskies Inc members...any member. The price break was more than an annual Inc. membership. This did attract a few members into local clubs.

I'm hoping that we will expand that one tournament into a little trail of tournaments this coming year. Seemed like guys who fished it liked it and it made the club a nice little amount of money that we will use for stocking or the raising of fish in the future.

Stay tuned for more!
Junkman
Posted 10/30/2014 8:45 AM (#737660 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 1220
I suppose I may have implied a preference for "cash-only" events which isn't exactly where I'm at. I fished both Milwaukee MI chapter events this year, (even got a fish at one) and will provide St. Croix LT's for both next year. Also fished the Headwater's chapter Spring Classic (got a fish there too) and Paul's Pro Am. Looking very much at joining the Kevin Worral event too and supplied an LT last year even though I couldn't make it. Please believe I support everybody's tournaments. I just think there is a place for more (sort of) pro events. I love the PMTT, but it's only three events and a championship. My goal is just to have a great tournament to go to every weekend from ice-out to freeze-up. When I finally leave the junk-yard, that's my retirement plan. If I'm forced to stay home, my wife makes me watch the Batchlorette!
hoosierhunter
Posted 10/30/2014 10:52 AM (#737682 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 427
Junkman,
As I have said before you need to try out the Illinois Muskie Tournament Trail. You can not beat the atmosphere and they are raising money and doing many productive things for the fishery. They have started a scholarship program that gives money to a person going into the fields related to fishery biology, they have and continue to raise money for the stocking program in the state, and are actively involved in most things that have to do with the muskie fishery in the state of Illinois. They are in the process of expanding their interaction with all of the clubs throughout the state and have some really exciting things in the works. They do not pay out as high as some of the other tournaments do but they don't cost as much either and you could not ask for a better bunch of guys to be around.
esoxaddict
Posted 10/30/2014 1:06 PM (#737708 - in reply to #737682)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 8703
I think most guys want to see at least a reasonable chance at a return on their investment should they catch a fish. That said, I don't think many know what it costs to run a tournament. I suspect that's where most of the money goes. It would be nice to see payouts to more-than-a-few places, so if you catch a fish you at least have a chance at getting your entry fees back. It would also be nice to provide entrants with a rundown of where the money actually goes. I think any bitterness about payouts would quickly fade if folks knew what it costs to have a tournament in the first place.
vegas492
Posted 10/30/2014 1:20 PM (#737713 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 1023
Esoxaddict: I don't think it costs very much at all. When we put ours together, the total cost was a permit, which I think was $50 or so. Outside of that, it was pure manpower. We had judgeboats, 2 of them. And they were chapter members who donated their time. Rules meeting was held at Smokeys, and they were great as they opened up really early for us, at no cost.

I don't know if the days of 75-100 boat tournaments will ever be back. But it sure would be nice to get a 30-40 boat field again. When you have that much in entry fees, you can pay out a lot of places and make it worthwhile. When you only draw 10-15 teams that makes it a lot tougher.
danmuskyman
Posted 10/30/2014 4:16 PM (#737752 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 619
Location: Madison, WI
First off, in the event of a tournament trail, I would like to see a running tally of the championship payout. So as of the start, championship payout is $0.00 and that total will build as the year goes on based on # of entries in the scheduled events. No more promises of huge payouts only to have like 1/4 of it actually pay. This way there are no surprises and everyone knows exactly what your fishing for. I also feel that teams should not be invited to fish a championship unless they had fished an event that year. Also pay only places that caught fish. There is no need to draw three places if only 2 fish were caught, that's just taking money from the two teams who rightfully deserve it by actually doing what everyone came there to do - catch fish. Also stick to your tournament rules and don't change them halfway through? Seems to me like these simple things could really make a great new trail!
jdsplasher
Posted 10/30/2014 7:27 PM (#737793 - in reply to #737708)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 2219
Location: SE, WI.
QUOTE]esoxaddict - 10/30/2014 1:06 PM I think most guys want to see at least a reasonable chance at a return on their investment should they catch a fish. That said, I don't think many know what it costs to run a tournament. I suspect that's where most of the money goes. It would be nice to see payouts to more-than-a-few places, so if you catch a fish you at least have a chance at getting your entry fees back. It would also be nice to provide entrants with a rundown of where the money actually goes. I think any bitterness about payouts would quickly fade if folks knew what it costs to have a tournament in the first place.

 I like what Jeff had to say. I also think many more teams would enter if the entry fees were lower. Say a $150-$200 Per event. $300-$400 entries is just too steep for some. I think you would get more interest from the average fisherman that feel intimidated fishing a big money tourney.

 Let's say you had 4,500 in prize money. A break down like...

 $2,000.      1,000.      500.       400.      300      200.      100

 Just a fun tourney that is not real cut- throat.

Marty , I fished the  ironman in Sept. I thought someone else was going to restart that trail.

 Great subject Marty:)

 JD

 

 



Edited by jdsplasher 10/30/2014 7:32 PM
Junkman
Posted 10/31/2014 7:40 AM (#737838 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 1220
JD, I was at that tournament too (no fish again) and talked to the young guy who said he's going to start a new trail (not continue that one). Totally nice kid and I hope he does do it. I'm hoping this thread will give him insight as to what guys are looking for.
Junkman
Posted 10/31/2014 7:42 AM (#737839 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 1220
Just realized "nice kid" could be perceived as dismissing! Nothing like that meant! To me "kid" just means 45 and under!
sworrall
Posted 10/31/2014 8:37 AM (#737848 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 32761
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
I ain't a kid no more?

Dang.
Junkman
Posted 10/31/2014 9:40 AM (#737862 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 1220
If I said I never met anybody who thought Steve didn't look like an old guy...would the thread get froze? Just asking, mind you...not saying it...just asking if I said it?
sworrall
Posted 10/31/2014 12:01 PM (#737891 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 32761
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
Yeah, I admit it, I fart dust these days.
esoxaddict
Posted 10/31/2014 12:39 PM (#737895 - in reply to #737891)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 8703
I think we need to revisit how payouts are structured. Fished a tournament some years back where there were so few fish caught they drew names out of a hat for the last few places. It was nice to have a shot at some $$$, and I guess that's a fair way to do it. But to me that money should go to the teams that caught fish. Maybe paying to x number of places with standard payout amounts is not the way to go.

Here's an idea:

Take the total amount of payout money at the end of the day, divide that by total inches of fish caught, and then pay everyone who caught fish in the tournament based on that number. So let's say you have $10,000 to pay out. 15 fish were caught that day, totaling 500 inches of musky. Divide the $10k by 500. You get $20. So that's your multiplier.

If you caught a 42" fish that day, you get 42x$20 = $840. If you caught 3 30" fish, you get 90x20 = $1,800. If you got a 38, 42, and 43, you get 38+42+43 (123)x$20=$2,460

The top team for the day still gets the most money. And the team who catches a 30" fish, effectively in last place, gets $60. Everybody who caught fish gets something. The whole amount is paid out. If everyone is catching fish, a lot of guys get a little money. If only a few teams score, those few teams get a larger sum of money.

Maybe there are tournaments doing this, I don't know. But it seems to me that it would be a LOT more fun knowing that every qualifying fish had some sort of payout attached, and if you scored on a tough day it could be quite a lot.

Is that dumb?
muskyman72
Posted 10/31/2014 3:35 PM (#737924 - in reply to #737895)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 81
Location: Knot on the WATER
All, I thought it was a great attractor I believed, not sure what happened to it, but the Ironman had a $10,000.00 Ins policy if someone caught a 50" fish.  Not sure what the cost of this was as for the policy, but was a nice little add on to the tournament, might be a good thing to have who ever either takes it over, or if any new one starts as of tournament wise.  Long live the Ironman!!
sworrall
Posted 10/31/2014 7:02 PM (#737951 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 32761
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
The Kevin Worrall Memorial offers a fully rigged Tuffy ride for a 51, and if caught on a Suick, add $10K. Insurance is not cheap, but isn't awful, either.

Addict, that formula made my head ache.
esoxaddict
Posted 10/31/2014 9:02 PM (#737961 - in reply to #737951)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 8703
sworrall - 10/31/2014 7:02 PM

The Kevin Worrall Memorial offers a fully rigged Tuffy ride for a 51, and if caught on a Suick, add $10K. Insurance is not cheap, but isn't awful, either.

Addict, that formula made my head ache.


It's actually really simple. But then when I try to explain it it sounds ridiculously complicated.
sworrall
Posted 10/31/2014 9:30 PM (#737967 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 32761
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
That is exactly to problem.
esoxaddict
Posted 11/1/2014 12:03 AM (#737979 - in reply to #737967)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 8703
It's easy. Whatever the total payout is, divide that number by the total number of inches of fish caught. That number is your payout per inch of fish. You can add whatever prizes for a 50" fish or whatever. But the cash payout is all based on that number. No matter what, if you catch a (legal) fish, you're getting some sort of cash prize. If 15 other teams caught fish, you're not getting much. If only 3 teams caught fish, you're getting quite a bit more.

It's a much better measure of your angling success for the day.
sworrall
Posted 11/1/2014 1:04 PM (#738033 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 32761
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
Small possible arguments:
1) If there are numbers of single smaller fish caught by large numbers of teams the top payout is diluted unacceptably. Basically, I'm saying it's rewarding mediocrity in many cases.
2) Way more work to prepare for the 'weigh in'
3) A ton more tax work for the organizer, and each winner has to receive a tax form and report the money, a hassle for $60.
Clint
Posted 11/2/2014 7:21 PM (#738223 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 89
I don't you should be invited to a championship. If only 6 or 8 or however many boats it is boats qualify then thats it. Kind of unfair to the teams that actually caught a fish and qualified if someone won that didn't qualify
cave run legend
Posted 11/2/2014 8:41 PM (#738237 - in reply to #738223)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 2097
What about winner take all?
sworrall
Posted 11/2/2014 9:29 PM (#738242 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!



Posts: 32761
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
That would encourage participation.

Not a good idea at all, but you already know that.
Flambeauski
Posted 11/3/2014 8:04 AM (#738268 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 4343
Location: Smith Creek
Guaranteed payouts for non-charity events. It isn't the participating anglers' fault the field doesn't fill. They shouldn't be penalized for the tourney organizer failing to fill the field.
Pay the anglers first, then take your profits by filling the field completely, a reward for a job well done.
Junkman
Posted 11/3/2014 12:03 PM (#738308 - in reply to #737551)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 1220
There's another aspect the PMTT likely captures best. It's a season of travel and competition even though there are just 3 qualifiers. If there were six or seven...it would be perfect! It's not just a tournament...it's more like a "summer." Sure there are the "Aces," some wannabes even a few "jerkbaits" here and there, but the vast majority are a group who just like competition added to a social activity. They get rooms or cabins together, go to the restaurants and bars together, have a big old party whenever they get to some specific town. They wear their "brag shirts" to the meetings and show off their big boats to each other....and more or less serve the same purpose a "Harley" event, Horse Show, or any similar sort of group thing. My boat dealer does it with auto racing! You find a thing you like, and a group you like, and you enjoy your life. That's how you have a great time when you don't win, and with muskys, YOU MAINLY DON"T WIN! It's a lifestyle!
Lumpy
Posted 11/3/2014 3:31 PM (#738323 - in reply to #738308)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 102
Wonder if the "nice kid" that's going to attempt a replacement for Ironman would mind coming on here and informing us of what his plans are for his series? Or maybe even show up to a local Muskies Inc or other area club meeting to talk about it with members. The more people feel like they are part of it from the ground up, that their input helped make this thing a reality, would most likely bring more participation.
Rules I would love to see:
Entry Fees: max of $200 per team of 2
Payouts : 15 or less teams - 3 places; 16 - 30 teams - 5 places; 30 - 50 teams - 7 places (must catch a fish to place...if not enough teams catch fish to fill payout spots, the extra money gets split up evenly by the # of teams that did catch fish and is added to each places payout)
Championship : only teams that caught fish in previous events can qualify - keep the championship purse updated throughout the series on the series website so people can see what they are aiming for...it will increase interest.
vegas492
Posted 11/3/2014 3:38 PM (#738324 - in reply to #738323)
Subject: Re: A civil discussion....Please!


Posts: 1023
Well, depending on who you talk to, I may not be "nice" and at 40, not really a "kid", but I did tell people that I was open to Muskies Inc (Milwaukee Chapter) running 3-4 tournaments on Pewaukee next year.

We have our format and can tweak it as needed.

But, my grand "vision" would be to include other chapters. I'd love to get a tournament trail going in which Pewaukee is a stop, as is Waubesa or Monona, as is the Fox Chain...etc. If local chapters are willing, they can run it usuing our already created promotional material, including the rules. Could even include Hayward/Eagle River/Green Bay...etc.

And we could have a true "trail" that ends with a true Championship. Each chapter could keep the defined proceeds of their tournament and then every chapter would "win". And so would stocking efforts.

At least that is the plan...in my head. At our next Board meeting, I'll go over it in more depth and then we will probably reach out to Madison and Antioch right away to see if they are interested in hosting an event.

The absolute key to doing this as a trail is getting buy in from other chapters that are close in proximity.

Edited by vegas492 11/3/2014 3:39 PM
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)