Muskie Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
Moderators: Slamr

View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page]

Muskie Fishing -> General Discussion -> Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie
 
Message Subject: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie
Sidejack
Posted 3/3/2018 11:14 PM (#894948 - in reply to #894947)
Subject: Re: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie





Posts: 1080


Location: Aurora
Also, weren't some of them suspected to have been purchased from people who netted them?
true tiger tamer
Posted 3/4/2018 3:16 PM (#894979 - in reply to #893481)
Subject: Re: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie




Posts: 343


It is embarrassing that those controversial fish have been allowed to remain records this long. I remember when Mr. Pete Mania and Mr. Eli Singer pointed out the facts regarding those fishes size and were chastised by a couple members of the Hall and the city of Hayward. I admire the fact that they stood their ground. Those fish should have and could have been removed if a bunch of the Wisconsin muskie guides and muskie fishermen had banded together and put a bunch of pressure on the Hall to remove them and I'd imagine that the IGFA would have followed suit. I've always thought muskie anglers were on a higher level than most other angling groups with the strong catch and release effort, care in fish handling, etc. A visit to the IGFA museum and talking to other angling groups, showed me that muskie anglers, through the record keeping mess are looked down upon and lumped with the largemouth bass and walleye record frauds. Very depressing, the Modern world record keeping group isn't well known throughout the angling community, so I wish the regular record keeping organisations would accept the fact those fish are frauds and correct the situation.
IGotTheFeverBIG
Posted 3/8/2018 8:07 AM (#895487 - in reply to #893481)
Subject: RE: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie





Posts: 43


Location: S. Wisconsin
Excellent job Larry Ramsell, keep up the good work!

I have always found the Strife and Crimes of Louie Spray to be fantastically entertaining.
As a side note to your post, I think we know how big Louie's 1939 fish was; it was 48.5 pounds or LESS.

I submit as evidence a copy from the July 27, 1939 Sawyer County Gazette. This is the DAY Louie allegedly "caught" his 1939 59-pound, 8-ounce "World Record". *

Just as the paper was going to print, it appears Louie got them to HALT the presses to include his magnificent catch that morning;

A 48-pound 8-ounce fish, that bested last seasons largest caught by Widmer Smith by a mere OUNCE... (he he!!)

This was the ONLY fish Spray "caught" that day; "caught this Thursday morning"... July 27th, 1939. In print. Undeniable. No 59-8 in sight. Never happened.

The photos were probably not usable, meaning the fish didn't look big enough, and the photo of Van Camp with fish is probably unrelated to the 1939 catch.

So the indisputable fact is that the "World Record" fish Louie "caught" on July 27, 1939 WAS LISTED IN THE NEWSPAPER as 48.5 pounds (probably AFTER being loaded, with the idea of ONLY beating Widmer AT FIRST.) This alone is evidence of fraud, and would be sufficient to dismiss all OTHER Spray "records" according to the FWFHOF's own rules.

PS Does anyone know what big event occurred in the town of Hayward on October 20th, 1949?
Hint: It happened at "The Aladdin Inn", see p. 213 of "Three Record Muskies in his Day"...

* File size too big to upload, bummer. Will try again later.

Edited by IGotTheFeverBIG 3/8/2018 8:26 AM
esoxross
Posted 3/8/2018 10:36 AM (#895501 - in reply to #893481)
Subject: Re: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie




Posts: 3


It seems every other year or so we get dead bored in late winter and old Louie comes up. Well here we are in 2018 still talking about these "World Record Fish". I wrote the Esox Angler magazine article in 2002 - "Do the Math", with Pete Maina. This was one of the first exposures to these altered fish based on simply using the girth formula. Of course this was "controversial" to challenge these great fish back then. I, like many others was simply after the truth on what is the biggest muskie ever caught.

Well, as expected, I was personally chastised along with Pete on the web forums and in written letters from Detloff, Ramsell and the HOF as well. Larry later changed his position completely on all this.

The silver lining was all the work done by Jerry Newman and the world record muskie alliance. Jerry took the lead on really diving deep on these fish after the EA article. Check out his website, interesting stuff.

Like everything else, it may take some time but eventually the truth prevails.
sworrall
Posted 3/8/2018 6:21 PM (#895564 - in reply to #893481)
Subject: Re: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie





Posts: 32784


Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin
In this case it should, thanks to some hard work by some good folks. We took a little heat here for hosting the conversation, but it was well worth it for all of us to finally find out what a WR muskie might be and have an accurate target to shoot for. That's all anybody wanted, and the legend and lore to be recognized as it was. It was a different time and muskie anglers were considered by those not living in the woods bad-arse Northwoods rough and tumblers. That wasn't a bad thing, it was simply what was the norm at the time.

When the sport grew to what it became in the 90's, it was time to look at the legend and check it against reality, which was done. I'd still like to see the HOF drop the insistence that the old 'records' are legitimate, and accept that it's rich lore and history.

If a book would sell well about the 'world record Muskies' of the Hayward area, it would be the book about how all this went down, it's quite an interesting story. The last few chapters could be a re-print of the current book out there with a follow up by the same author.
ToddM
Posted 3/8/2018 6:30 PM (#895565 - in reply to #893481)
Subject: RE: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie





Posts: 20178


Location: oswego, il
It has been an great investigation and alot of push back. Hard to get past the iron curtain. Great work by everyone who seeks the truth!


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(IMG_7139_1520124933548_1520555500790.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments IMG_7139_1520124933548_1520555500790.jpg (109KB - 456 downloads)
IGotTheFeverBIG
Posted 3/9/2018 9:20 AM (#895629 - in reply to #895565)
Subject: RE: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie





Posts: 43


Location: S. Wisconsin
Sawyer County Gazette

Winter, Sawyer County, Wisconsin, Thursday, July 27, 1939.

"Our Region's Muskie Prizes Largest For Season; Over 48 and 46 Pounds"

With copy prepared and ready to be printed featuring what seemed most certain to be the largest fish of the see if not all season, came a double surprise this (Thursday) morning when Louis Spray, over from Hayward with a tourist friend, brought in a new champion for the current season, a muskie which tipped local scales at 48 1/2 pounds.

Besides coming so closely on the heels of its predecessor, the mammoth fish tops by a single ounce the 1938 champion tiger beauty - the 48-pound 7-ounce muskie secured last summer by Widmer Smith of Loretta, in Blaisdell Lake of this territories lakes region.

Before departing for the county seat a large number of local citizens, tourists, and others witnessed the enormous prize fish.

When questioned as to where they caught the muskie, Louie hesitated in divulging that secret, but it's known that whenever that former citizen of southern Sawyer county wants to obtain a big one, he comes back to old favorite haunts of this lakes region and he is usually successful in such endeavors.
__________________________
For the news---read the Gazette.

In case the images are too blurry to read, that is the exact text in the article.

In the article next to this one it mentions "The new season-pace-setter was a forty-six pound six ounce tiger that Bob Mann of Winter, caught in our nearby popular Barker Lake."

This is the fish that "tied" Louie's 46-pound 3-ounce, 52-inch fish out of the Chippewa Flowage caught over a week before this. Lou wasn't the type to "let it go".

So Louie was able to top Widmer Smith AND break his tie with Bob Mann with this 48-8 fish. Such a gifted Angler...

There are other inconsistencies with Spray's 1939 "WR" fish. Louie at first thought 58-9 was enough to bag the top spot, due to George Neimuth's 58-pound 4-ounce fish from LOTW on 9/24/32, and THAT is the weight he first claimed.

Upon being told about the Haver Fish (58 lbs. 14 oz.) caught in June that beat Neimuth in correspondence, Spray changed the weight to 59-8, citing a typo. The man had no shame or scruples when it came to fish stories. I think he and all the old timers knew all fishing contests were cheaters folly...

Spray had a pattern of behavior where he would "outdo" others who bested him by just a little bit and regain the top spot. (This happened with Widmer, Haver, and Cal.)

He really seemed to push the boundaries of believability, I suspect because he had dirt on so many others in town, ranging from loaded muskies, gambling debts, prostitution, moonshining and bootlegging, and perhaps even fouler deeds. He practically DARED the locals to speak out against him. especially in 1949. More on that later.

[I'd like to know why he had directions to distill chloroform in his autobiography...]

Great perspective from Steve Worrall. I agree 100% with him about the interest surrounding the TRUE stories involving all those characters in the NorthWoods.

There really is so much more to reveal about Spray, and not just related to World Record Muskies...

In the meantime, we've lost some good men and women, and some of their wisdom, irreplaceable memories, and the wonderful experiences that they had to share. Lifetimes of knowledge, from an era now extinct, should be shared and passed down.

Perhaps it's time to revisit this matter, before we lose any more of our wizened elders.

So nobody knows what big event happened on October 20, 1949 at the Aladdin Inn?



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_untitled(6).png)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_untitled(6).png (18KB - 452 downloads)
supertrollr
Posted 3/9/2018 6:08 PM (#895666 - in reply to #893481)
Subject: Re: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie


mr ramsell
it would be nice if you could make a good documentary whit some interview,pictures etc.imo it would be a good way to kill these bs records for good.book is good but vids have more power,because it would get more visibility.wi have never been a top destination for potential wr,even less in the 30 with all the pollution,fish keepers,poor lures choice,knowledge etc etc.i think that record have been maintain just to attract aliens ,is that possible ?
Larry Ramsell
Posted 3/11/2018 7:33 AM (#895984 - in reply to #893481)
Subject: Re: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie




Posts: 1275


Location: Hayward, Wisconsin
supertroller: expensive endeavor; reluctant "informants" and not much market for it, sorry.
IGotTheFeverBIG
Posted 3/11/2018 3:38 PM (#896081 - in reply to #895984)
Subject: Re: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie





Posts: 43


Location: S. Wisconsin
Ramsell's post on the Malo fish does indeed help set precedent in showing how muskellunge were used as promotional currency all over the Pine Belt... and obtained by any means necessary...

So from the Gazette Article we know conclusively that Spray's 1939 World Record, sworn by affafavit to be caught on July 27, 1939, was really a fish NO MORE THAN 48 1/2 pounds, probably "scammed" from Paul Petit. That 59 pounder never existed. No photogrammetry necessary.
"Louie was a shyster."- Alton Van Camp.
Van would know, he was a real backwoodsman...

Here's an overlooked factoid in Louie's 1949 69-11 fish, the one that the HOF currently worships like a Pagan Deity. [I'm typing from a cheap smartphone with junk software, my image resizing capabilities are non existent] So here is the text from the image posted here:
__________________
"The Spoils of Victory"

"The first public announcement of Spray's new record catch was made on the evening of October 20th at the Aladdin Inn in Hayward at the annual dinner meeting of the Hayward Senior Chamber of Commerce. Remembering the boast he made to break Cal Johnson's record by fall, Louie Spray just couldn't resist announcing his claim of catching the new world record muskie to the startled group which had gathered to honor Cal Johnson for the catching of his record muskie earlier that summer.

The Chamber had just presented Johnson with a trophy of gratitude from the citizens of Hayward for returning the world's muskie capital back to Hayward, when Spray made his big announcement. Louie had upstaged his friend, but Cal would later retaliate by threatening Spray with the yarn of an even larger fish having been caught."
_____________

p. 213 of "Three Record Muskies in His Day; The Life and Times of Louie Spray" by John Dettloff. (Excellent, highly incriminating book. I recommend it.)


So not ONLY did Louis Bolser Spray:

(1) Send a telegram on August 28, 1949 to the VERY FIRST Hayward Musky Carnival where Cal Johnson's MOUNT of Old Evil Eye was first unveiled to the public, stating: "DONT GIVE AWARD YET. I WILL CATCH A NEW WORLD RECORD MUSKY THIS SEASON. SIGNED, LOUIE SPRAY." (After being read to the laughing public, Cal Johnson was then introduced, given a TROPHY from the PEOPLE of Hayward, and a MEDAL from the boys of Camp Big Chief.)


Not ONLY did Louie:

(2) Foreshadow his deed in an October 9, 1949 live radio broadcast on WCCO (held by Cedric Adams at Sarona's Potato Festival where Spray and Johnson were BOTH interviewed): "Cedric, you know the old saying, once a fisherman, always a liar? Now Cal here might have caught a bigger muskie than I did, but he ain't no bigger liar."

But Louie Spray ALSO just happened to:

(3) Beat Cal's record ON THE DAY OF CAL'S CoC AWARD, October 20th, 1949. He also "caught" Chin-Whiskers Charlie IN TIME to go and interrupt that Hayward Senior Chamber of Commerce annual dinner meeting as Johnson was being honored. He was able to wipe a stinky skidmark on yet ANOTHER one of Cal Johnson's TROPHY Ceremonies.

He. Just. Couldn't. Resist.

Can you imagine the looks on everyone's faces at that Award Ceremony at the Aladdin Inn? The sick feelings in the pits of their stomachs, upon hearing that (former CoC member, btw) Louie B. Spray was AGAIN going to put Hayward under the microscope with another one of his "performances"? After all the scrutiny and hard work in pulling off the Johnson HOAX? The whole Chamber of Commerce probably pooped their drawers right THERE.

Cal must have thought, "My GOD! This RUBE is going to get everyone busted! WHY did I agree to participate in this SHAM?"

I noticed everyone seemed to miss this last, MOST IMPORTANT coincidence regarding that ridiculous episode in Hayward's history. I think even Maina left it out of the impossible 10/20/49 timeline. It's right there in Dettloff's book, but written in a way to obscure what an impossible coincidence it was.

We are supposed to believe Spray had yet ANOTHER world record sized fish SPOTTED after Cal Johnson took the record, Louie PREDICTED he would catch it, and when he CAUGHT it, it turned out to be just a little BIGGER than Cal's fish, AND was caught on the day of Cal Johnson's Award Ceremony, this time from the Hayward Senior Chamber of Commerce. AND he WEIGHED the fish (how else would he know he beat Cal?) AND made it there IN TIME to upset the whole evening...

With. OUT. the. Fish.
Would. NOT. Show. Anyone.

And the HOF expects us to swallow this magically splendiferous, euphorically fantastical, ridiculously VAINGLORIOUS fish story...

Why Spray didn't use his ExtraSensoryPerception to make himself rich at the horse track or casino is quite the mystery. Think of the personal sacrifices he made by instead using his clairvoyance to fish muskie and promote the Hayward Lakes Region.

I guess Louie was just generous to a fault... Hey! Maybe we can get the Pope to canonize him as a Saint...?



Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(WP_20180308_01_53_14_Pro[1].jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments WP_20180308_01_53_14_Pro[1].jpg (86KB - 448 downloads)
muskie! nut
Posted 3/11/2018 4:24 PM (#896086 - in reply to #894674)
Subject: Re: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie





Posts: 2894


Location: Yahara River Chain
Reelwise - 3/1/2018 8:37 PM

It's a shame people have potentially lied about the size of the fish they caught in Wisconsin...


And New York
IGotTheFeverBIG
Posted 3/11/2018 4:57 PM (#896090 - in reply to #896086)
Subject: Re: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie





Posts: 43


Location: S. Wisconsin
muskie! nut - 3/11/2018 4:24 PM

Reelwise - 3/1/2018 8:37 PM

It's a shame people have potentially lied about the size of the fish they caught in Wisconsin...


And New York


This is NOT a knock on Wisconsin or Hayward, and ESPECIALLY not their citizens. I love Northern Wisconsin. The next WR, the first true 60 pounder, which WILL be caught in 2018 or 2019, might come outta WI, though it wont be an inland lake...

The cheating happened everywhere. I'm sorry, but the top 28 muskellunge or so, all the way down to Mark Kontianen's 54 pounder, are questionable.

Both the Resort owners AND the MAGAZINES like Field and Stream who held the contests were happy for the publicity. I want to underline that. The contest holders wanted the publicity and sales just like the resort owners wanted the tourism.

Please obtain copies of any book written by the Pike Ferret, Jan Eggers. You will find the same phenomenon with European Pike. It's fantastically entertaining.

Pike in Europe get girthier than even muskie. A lot can be learned studying photos of those brobdingnagian monsters...


Zoom - | Zoom 100% | Zoom + | Expand / Contract | Open New window
Click to expand / contract the width of this image
(WP_20180308_01_55_29_Pro.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments WP_20180308_01_55_29_Pro.jpg (129KB - 539 downloads)
thompwater
Posted 3/11/2018 8:31 PM (#896117 - in reply to #893481)
Subject: Re: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie




Posts: 18


When Reggie Jackson was ask about Babe Ruth's called shot he said "absolutely, B was talking trash and backed it up." He then said." Only three people in sports history could talk that kind of trash and back it up, Babe Ruth, Momahad Ali, and of coarse Reggie Jackson!"
I guess Reggie never heard about Louie
Jerry Newman
Posted 3/13/2018 9:41 PM (#896524 - in reply to #895501)
Subject: Re: Louie SpraY and the Malo Muskie




Location: 31

esoxross - 3/8/2018 10:36 AM It seems every other year or so we get dead bored in late winter and old Louie comes up. Well here we are in 2018 still talking about these "World Record Fish". I wrote the Esox Angler magazine article in 2002 - "Do the Math", with Pete Maina. This was one of the first exposures to these altered fish based on simply using the girth formula. Of course this was "controversial" to challenge these great fish back then. I, like many others was simply after the truth on what is the biggest muskie ever caught. Well, as expected, I was personally chastised along with Pete on the web forums and in written letters from Detloff, Ramsell and the HOF as well. Larry later changed his position completely on all this. The silver lining was all the work done by Jerry Newman and the world record muskie alliance. Jerry took the lead on really diving deep on these fish after the EA article. Check out his website, interesting stuff. Like everything else, it may take some time but eventually the truth prevails.

Hey Ross, hope you're doing well. Thanks for the kudos with the work done but I respectfully disagree… everyone who helped deserves equal credit.

Probably something that some of you are not aware of is that before that EA article most muskie fisherman still believed in those records, and that a 70 pounder was just one lucky cast away on most lakes. I suspect because there were so many bogus fish claims they kind of supported each other in a bit of a liars triangle. Things began to change with the advent of the Internet, but even then it was a completely different atmosphere as the mere mention that “King Lou’s” records were questionable would get you shouted down as just being jealous and “not having any proof”.  

While I'm glad those records have been exposed for what they really are, I still think most non-musky fisherman still believe those records are legit. Hopefully, someday when the dishonest chuckleheads at the Hayward Hall of Fame are replaced with honorable people those dubious local records will fall… just because they continue to recognize them doesn't make it any more right, the sad reality is that it makes it even more wrong. They can cover it up, continue to lie about it, and ignore the truth all they want it… but that is not going to make it go away.

 

 

Jerry Newman
Posted 3/30/2018 11:01 AM (#900595 - in reply to #896524)
Subject: Re: Louie Spray and the Malo Muskie




Location: 31

Just thought it would be a good idea to tag the link to the end of the thread for anyone who happens to stumble on it in the future.

As always, we are very grateful that Muskie 1st continues to allow this information to be made public.

WMA - Louie Spray Record

Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 2 [30 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)