|
|
Posts: 1460
  
Location: Eastern Ontario | I only know of one body of water that puts out true 57+ fish every single year. And there may be a couple more capable but not on a yearly bases. |
|
| |
|
| We'll let's just say that 57" fish are caught every single year! FACT! I know of about 25 + 57"ers and i've seen the pictures of everyone of them! They don't make it to these message boards for a reason! The people that catch them, don't need to post the pictures on here to feel good about themselves and beat there chests. They simple enjoy the moment with the select group of guys year in and year out! All I can say is that i've been BLESSED to be able to enjoy every single one of them! Peace out! |
|
| |
|
 
Location: Rhinelander, Wisconsin | I've been reading the last post every day trying to find a response that doesn't sound snotty. So far, I've failed, and I'm a wordy son of a gun.
Richard, I agree, not too many places that kick 'em out regularly. By the way, Happy Holidays! |
|
| |
|
| just curious but when did 57 become a magic #? seems since more big fish are getting caught fish like 48''s aren't considered big anymore. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2957
Location: Ogden, UT Pineview Reservoir | Apparently Pineview reservoir here in Utah is home to more 60 inchers than you could shake a stick at, and they feed on 70 inch carp. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2640
| Bigfishstud - 12/22/2008 12:46 AM
We'll let's just say that 57" fish are caught every single year! FACT! I know of about 25 + 57"ers and i've seen the pictures of everyone of them! They don't make it to these message boards for a reason! The people that catch them, don't need to post the pictures on here to feel good about themselves and beat there chests. They simple enjoy the moment with the select group of guys year in and year out! All I can say is that i've been BLESSED to be able to enjoy every single one of them! Peace out!
so let me get this straight...
The guys who catch 57" fish every year, they don't need to come here and beat their chests about it, right?
[...] "FACT! I know of about 25 + 57"ers and i've seen the pictures of everyone of them!" [...]
You've seen pictures. And you're bragging about it... here.
The irony is astounding.
Edited by esoxaddict 3/10/2009 3:56 PM
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 2484
Location: Pewaukee, Wisconsin | I don't think he was bragging just stating a fact to answer the original post. Lots of lookers on this site. Some may reply to a post and most just keep on looking. Getting slammed or questioned is only going to keep them from posting more.
You never know who adds info here. That post could have been from a guy who guides clients to these monsters. He is in the LOOP for sure.
I believe that "We'll let's just say that 57" fish are caught every single year! FACT!"
Peace out bro............. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 8
| lol you call a 57 big huh?!! my biggest is 42  lol |
|
| |
|
Posts: 75
| .....so did we ever get a picture and a confirmation on this one, Don?
-Eric |
|
| |
|
Posts: 160
Location: Cave Run Lake KY. | Don. In Larry Ramsell's 1997 ( A Compendium of Musky Angling History ) He lists 93 muskies in his all time 50-pound Club. In order for a 57" musky to be 50# it has to be around 26.5" in girth . Therefore most 57" fish whould make the 50# Club. Im sure that in the 12 years sence than quite a few 50#ers have been released. I know of and have seen two such fish taken in the spring from the Sioux Narrows area, these fish were taken back to Ohio and mounted and are not talked about only for private display. There is no way to keep track of fish like these as no one will say wear they were caught. I only know of these fish because I was there when they were caught and got to see them. Im sure that in the Georgian bay erea there are 57" fish caught and kept the week before the season. No one is going to say to much. I know of Muskie Inc. menbers that don't enter big fish in the members only contest because they have to say where they where caught. Lake X - - Good Luck my friend Good Luck. Marv. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 205
Location: Wausau, WI | cjrich - 12/20/2008 9:04 PM
If I caught a 57" (or larger) Musky, I surely would not want to keep that a secret.
If I caught a 57" or bigger I COULDN'T keep it a secret! Get a couple cocktails in me and I'd turn into a blubbering fool....wait...maybe it wouldn't even take one!  |
|
| |
|
| ChinWhiskers - 6/20/2009 11:14 AM
...I know of and have seen two such fish taken in the spring from the Sioux Narrows area, these fish were taken back to Ohio and mounted and are not talked about only for private display. There is no way to keep track of fish like these as no one will say wear they were caught. I only know of these fish because I was there when they were caught and got to see them. Im sure that in the Georgian bay erea there are 57" fish caught and kept the week before the season. No one is going to say to much... Marv.
If they we indeed taken in "the spring from the Sioux Narrows area" and Gbay "caught and kept the week before the season" maybe standing up for what is right and turning in poachers would be the first step. Something to consider in helping our neighbors to the north don't you think?
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 160
Location: Cave Run Lake KY. | I was refering to 57'ers being caught over the years. In the Sioux Nerrows's area the two fish were caught on opening week, two years apart. The Georgian Bay fish were caught on the Friday before the season and kept over night to be entered in a local contest the next day. These are fish that don't show up on fish lists. As for turning in poachers, Ill leave that to someone who doesn't whant to get invited back to to fish or hunt on lake X or private land. It just might be our neighbors to the north don't want our help. ( changes in latitude changes in attitude ) |
|
| |
|
Posts: 400
Location: Fairmont, WV | I know of one 58 I believe that a friend of mine caught. He got a replica and it's a beautiful fish. Hanging over his TV. Maybe if he reads this he'll post a picture.
Shawn |
|
| |
